• oyzmo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Our society structure. Society is still structured with a few persons living extravagantly like kings on the top, while the masses are mostly content with mediocre scraps.

      • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        4 days ago

        One I’ve heard recently was…the hair styles you see on ancient Roman art look remarkably modern. Art historians got to wondering just how they managed such complex hairstyles without modern hairspray, plastic clips or elastic bands? A hairstylist took one look and said “They’re sewn.” The historians go “NAAAAAH that can’t be it. Whoever heard of sewing hair?” The hairstylist goes “Hairstylists. Watch” and then she replicated the styles on the statues by sewing.

        Here’s another one: Marine biologists long struggled to understand/describe the shapes of certain marine life, including corals. They had these weird wavy patterns that didn’t make sense to us rectangle building monkeys. Meanwhile, a mathematician studying hyperbolic geometry realized that crochet patterns that add loops with every row achieve wavy ruffles in a hyperbolic pattern. It took a few others to piece those two ideas together, to recognize the coral structures as having hyperbolic geometry as a means of maximizing surface area while minimizing volume. The Crochet Coral Reef project has been making crocheted models of sea life ever since.

        As a woodworker, it amazes me how the mortise and tenon is still hanging on.

        If you aren’t familiar, a mortise is a square or rectangular hole in a board, might go all the way through, might not. A tenon is a square peg basically cut on the end of a board to fit into a mortise. This produces a very strong joint.

        The very oldest intact wooden structure known on earth - a well head in Germany - is held together with mortise and tenons. We don’t know the name of the man who built it, because written language hadn’t been invented yet.

        There is a thing called a floating tenon. Imagine you want to join two boards, but don’t really want to cut a tenon onto either. Make a mortise in each, then make a third smaller board to fill both tenons. Floating tenon, loose tenon, there are many words for it. The Ancient Egyptians held boat hulls together this way, the hull planks were joined edge to edge with loose tenons which were then cross-pinned with dowels. One such boat was found disassembled in a pit next to the Great Pyramid at Giza; the seal on the chamber was so good they said it smelled of cedar when opened. The ship was assembled and is currently on display.

        All the way on this end of history, the European tool brand Festool has a tool called a Domino. It has the form factor of a Lamello-type biscuit joiner, but the domino cuts with a wagging router bit to form a wide, short, deep mortise to insert store bought loose tenons into. This tool is so new, it is still protected under patent.

        We’ve been making mortise and tenons for tens of thousands of years, and yet we’re still innovating on the concept.

  • unitedwithme@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    96
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    A 5-day, 40 hour work week “standard”

    Somebody saying “bless you” to someone else who sneezes

    The president

    • BallShapedMan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      40
      ·
      5 days ago

      The amount of “modern” companies I had to fax shit too when my dad died was infuriating! Hyundai, Target, etc etc etc. Email is a thing dumb ass companies! Fuck me.

      • gummi134@fedinsfw.app
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        39
        ·
        5 days ago

        Many government departments and private companies consider faxed documents as a duplicated “original”, instead of a copy. Because that totally makes sense.

      • HubertManne@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        5 days ago

        I can’t exactly recommend the service which can be a bit annoying but clicksend allows you to send faxes and actually letters for pretty cheap. the letter thing is pretty nice when something demands a physical one. you upload a pdf and it gets printed and mailed out. fax works same way. fax is way cheaper obviously.

          • HubertManne@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            5 days ago

            just faster. you have to have a printer and paper for it and envelopes and stamps. with the service you just upload the pdf and put in the address and hit send. I mean I think most could see how it can be useful. Bit cheaper to print and fold and seal and stamp and drop in the box but with as unoften as I need to send a physical letter I like it.

          • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            4 days ago

            Then you need a printer, printer ink, an envelope, and stamps. If you really don’t send mail out that frequently, I can see the appeal of it. Could easily be cheaper. I also imagine it might have some utility to ADHD folks.

            • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.cafe
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              4 days ago

              It just occurred to me: I doubt my 26 year old son has ever sent anything in the mail himself. If he wants to send a message, it’s email or text, and if he wants to send a gift, he’ll order it on Amazon and have it delivered. I’ll have to ask him if he’s ever actually mailed anything.

          • HubertManne@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            youd be surprised. most required mail stuff is straight up bullshit type stuff and not really that senstitive. its usually just hoops they through up to slow down and stymie anything your entitled to.

      • empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        5 days ago

        It already has. Vast majority of companies still handling fax are using VoIP fax modems with digital receivers that turn it into a PDF. I haven’t seen a functioning copper landline probably since 2015…

      • jdr@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        I think the reason I didn’t know it is because it isn’t true.

        Unless you’re a Lincoln truther who thinks he wasn’t killed in 1865 way before fax machines were available in the USA and Japan.

        • lime!@feddit.nu
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          4 days ago

          there was a period of around 12 years where it would have been possible, given that they had both been in scotland at the time. between 1853 and 1865 it would have to have been an ex-samurai.

          • jdr@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            15
            ·
            4 days ago

            But of course they had to wait for the second one to be invented…

    • phoenixarise@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      Faxes are common in healthcare facilities and hospitals. I would imagine that they’re safer when it comes to sensitive data.

        • Cracks_InTheWalls@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          THANK YOU.

          You know another fun thing that can happen? A doctor moves practices and changes fax numbers, and the old number gets assigned to a new, completely unrelated non-medical group. But no one told the medical entity that sends faxes, and no one updated the relevant records. All of a sudden several months worth of PHI has been getting sent to a women’s clothing store.

          Fax in the medical field needs to die. Between the possibility of this happening, higher probability of transmission failure, paper (where offices are still using physical faxes) getting misplaced before getting filed in charts, etc., it’s just a plain bad way to send medical information in 2026.

          Edit: OH, and don’t get me started on fancy, marketing-designed lab reports that use colored indicators to communicate treatment-critical information that no one checked for legibility in black and white, yet still get sent by fax. Like, fucking WHAT??

          • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 days ago

            on’t get me started on fancy, marketing-designed lab reports that use colored indicators to communicate treatment-critical information that no one checked for legibility in black and white, yet still get sent by fax. Like, fucking WHAT??

            holy fuck

      • GenosseFlosse@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        5 days ago

        They are analog modems on a telephone line. There is no encryption at all, because they still need to be compatible with fax machines from the 1970s.

        There was also an exploit where someone sent a manipulated image via fax, which would exploit an old bug in a jpg library that is used in the software stack, so you can run your own code.

      • twoBrokenThumbs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 days ago

        Not really safer, they just work with the existing infrastructure. Personally, I think there’s still a place for fax, it’s essentially a convenient way to scan and transmit, and these days you can get them to your email or phone (not in healthcare because that’s not HIPAA compliant). Sure, not anybody’s first choice, but I think it’s still valid.

        • ChexMax@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 days ago

          It’s only convenient if you have access to a fax machine, which the majority of us don’t

          • twoBrokenThumbs@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            My comment was in context of existing business infrastructure. You’re right that most of us don’t have a fax machine, but many organizations still do and therefore it can be very convenient for B2B communication. And in the case of orgs that want faxes but you don’t have one, ifax is a thing as well.

            I’m not making an argument for faxes, I’m just saying for an outdated technology it’s stayed quite useful in the modern era.

  • lime!@feddit.nu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    64
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    homeopathy. you’d think germ theory would have killed it, but no.

    • WhyIHateTheInternet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      5 days ago

      To be fair my old high school acquaintances swear their oils made from magic plants literally healed their child’s cancer and my kid is only autistic because we took her to a doctor one time years ago.

      • HuudaHarkiten@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        4 days ago

        I once told a homeopathy person that my sister had a normal kid, then took the kid to a homeopath and now the kid is badly disabled.

        If they can make up shit, we can too.

    • OwOarchist@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 days ago

      It’s honestly troubling. I’ve seen homeopathic ‘treatments’ sold right next to real medicine in mainstream stores, with similar packaging, similar pricing, and only tiny fine print on the bottle saying that it’s homeopathic. And you have to know what ‘homeopathic’ means in order for that to have any impact; many don’t. It would be very easy to accidentally buy the homeopathic ‘treatment’ instead of one that actually works. I’ve almost made that mistake before myself, before I read the package more closely.

      (For anybody who doesn’t already know ‘homeopathic’ does NOT mean ‘herbal’ or ‘natural’ or anything like that. It’s not alternative medicine – it’s not medicine at all. Homeopathy is old, very debunked, and very bullshit psuedo-science that a traveling conman made up after supposedly having it supernaturally revealed to him in a drunken dream. The idea is that for any ailment, you take what causes that ailment, massively dilute it in water (or another substance) so much that there likely isn’t a single molecule of it left, and then the water will ‘remember’. Homeopathic medication is literally nothing. It’s plain water (or, in stores, often plain sugar pills). It contains no active ingredients of any kind, and it’s – at best – a placebo. It’s always a waste of money and may be dangerous if you fall for it and take it instead of actual, effective medicine.)

      • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        Homeopathy is old, but like, not even that old. It was invented in 1796. It’s younger than the united states, and was invented while France was doing their first revolution. They like to frame it as ancient wisdom rather than some German in the late 18th century took one idea off Paracelsus way too far, then retooled it until it stopped actively doing harm (because it did nothing) and came up with some bs to explain why it “works”

    • AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 days ago

      Although they’re struggling at the moment, due to their blood being harvested for use in biomedical research.[1]. Although fortunately, there have been synthetic alternatives developed in the last few years, so hopefully their numbers should recover as that is phased in.

      Edit: if this makes you feel overly sad, here is a palate cleanser(30 minute long, ideally listened to in one uninterrupted block). It’s one of my favourite things I stumbled across last year, and it makes me feel hopeful about the world. It made me cry, but in a good way.


      [1]: Linked article has more info, but the TL;DR is that their blood clots in the presence of bacterial toxins, so it’s super useful in stuff like vaccine development and production. They capture the crabs, harvest the blood and return the crabs alive, and the stats that the system has on this says that only a small percentage of them end up dying as a result of this. However, given that we can’t see how many of them die or fail to reproduce in the weeks and months following their release, we can’t confirm that.

      We do know that the numbers of a bird that feasts almost exclusively on horseshoe crab eggs have seen severe reductions over the last 40 or so years, so it seems likely that the impact of this harvesting on horseshoe crab populations is more severe than the official data suggests.

      It’s unfortunate because they fall between the cracks when it comes to animal research ethics. For one, the research isn’t being done on them, so they probably wouldn’t be protected under most existing legislation anyway. But also, animal research legislation doesn’t tend to give much protection to invertebrates (with the exception of octopuses, which are smart enough that they get additional protections).

      I think it’s a pretty interesting case study of a big gap in the legislation that protects the rights of animals — existing legislation focuses a lot on our duty to individual animals, but here, despite the harm to any one horseshoe crab seeming to be tolerably low, the vast scale at which we have been harvesting them has had an impact on the species as a whole.

      My view is that an anthropocentric framework that puts humans above all other animals is probably harmful in general and something we should work to undermine, but that if we are taking that tack (which seems necessary for the utilitarian view of “harvesting these crabs’ blood has saved many human lives” that most people seem to take on this topic), then we must also accept that we have an ethical duty to be good stewards of the natural world. We can’t have it both ways and think of ourselves as so rational and smart, but not accept the responsibility that would come with that.

      I find the legislative angle of it especially interesting, because most people I have told this to are shocked to learn of how they’re not protected, and they share at least some of my view that effective animal research ethics legislation should surely account for our duty to ecosystems as a whole. People far more learned than I in legal matters have struggled to think of ways we could effectively legislate this though. It’s possible that additional legislation isn’t the best way to handle this, and that we would be better served to aim to regulate in opposition to the economically extractivist ideology that seems to be the default setting nowadays (because horseshoe crabs are just an illustrative case study of the problem).

      I apologise for info dumping in reply to your joyful comment with such downer info. I do feel hopeful about the progress of synthetic alternatives though. I also find it a fascinating topic to learn about, even if it is a bit depressing


      1. 1 ↩︎

    • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 days ago

      Dude, I live with alligators, actual living dinosaurs. There’s an 8 footer in the pond directly across the street from us. His name is Rocky. He’s always basking on the bank on a sunny day.

      • dfyx@lemmy.helios42.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 days ago

        Sorry to disappoint but alligators are not closely related to dinosaurs even though they have existed for a long time. Birds on the other hand are dinosaurs.

          • M137@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            3 days ago

            Because that’s what defines something… A banana can look phallic but that doesn’t make it an “actual living penis”.

            How the fuck does someone in 2026 not know that alligators and crocodiles, reptiles, aren’t dinosaurs?

          • Goldholz @lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            We also look very monkey. We have a comon ancestor with monkeys but arent monkeys ourself. The same thing goes for crocodiles and aligators

      • Auli@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 days ago

        The chicken I ate last night is more closely related to dinosaurs then the alligator.

  • gera@feddit.nu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 days ago

    Paper visas. You have my passport number, is it not enough to check if I have valid visa?

  • Jaberw0cky@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    4 days ago

    Also I’m in the UK, visited the next town over last week and walked past a pub and thought, that looks like a pretty old building… turns out the pub was built and has been running as a pub since the 1500s