I don’t really care about Star Wars

  • bluesheep@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    The Wilhelm scream is not, and never was, a funny inside joke. When you’re watching an intense action scene and suddenly you hear this high pitched and often way to loudly mixed scream it instantly ruins the immersion.

    Any movie that adds it is instantly ruined for me. I can somewhat excuse older movies since it wasn’t that wildly used yet but any contemporary director/audio engineer adding it really needs to get the idea out of their head that it’s funny/clever/subtle. Cause it’s not.

    • hereiamagain@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      I’m mixed on this. If it’s a serious movie, then I agree wholeheartedly. It’s not funny and it breaks my immersion.

      But if it’s a more relaxed or even funny movie? Bring it on, the more subtle the better, I love hearing it, always gives me a chuckle when I’m in a chuckling mood.

      • hereiamagain@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        That doesn’t clock as the traditional Wilhelm scream to me.

        I’m not trying to say you’re wrong, I don’t know much about this. I’m just saying if I were watching this with zero context, I wouldn’t recognize it as being the Wilhelm scream. Whereas normally I hear it in every movie it’s in, pretty clearly.

        • Canopyflyer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          Now that you mention it, the scream in that clip is similar but a bit different. Good catch.

          The main point I was trying to make was that the person getting knocked off and falling is the person who made it popular. Personally, I hate the Wilhelm scream. It’s way over used and really doesn’t add anything to the scene it’s in.

    • glimse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Like most inside jokes, it was better before the internet.

      Now it’s the The Narwhal Bacons At Midnight of the industry.

  • Canopyflyer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 days ago

    Money enables art only to a certain point. Past that the stakes (money) is so high that all the decisions in making the movie is done by committee.

    Committees are incapable of making art.

    • fakeaustinfloyd@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I think there’s a fine line between collaboration and committee (members of a band can collaborate to make good music). But capitalism definitely works against art.

  • JakoJakoJako13@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    3 days ago

    More theaters need a rotation of classics. There’s a whole subset of movies I’d love to see in theaters again and having to wait for some small theater half an hour away to show one of those for one weekend a year is a bummer.

    • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      Sorry, chief. Best we can do is a lousy remake instead. That’s because the licensing rights for oldies are too hard to figure out so we can’t be bothered, and all creativity in Hollywood died in 1999.

        • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Yeah. I’ve had people fight me tooth and nail repeatedly that the Matrix was a “2000s movie.” I think this is another one of those Berenstain Bears things.

          (Most likely people watched it on DVD in the year 2000, since for a while there The Matrix was the movie that sold DVD players.)

      • BackgrndNoize@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        This is why I love my local theater, comparatively cheap tickets and the best prints for old classics running all the time.

        • LastYearsIrritant@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 days ago

          Sometimes they also bring in the director, or someone else that was involved in the production to talk about the movie. Those are really fun.

    • HubertManne@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Its funny because when I was young bargain theaters would play old stuff they could get cheap regularly. I think its tougher now that people can see something whenever they like.

  • Reygle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    With very few exceptions, the “Theatre” is dead to me. Last film I saw in one was Blade Runner 2049- a proper movie. There was nearly nobody else in my theater, but when I left there were tons of people leaving some stupid piece of shit movie down the hall.

  • karpintero@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    121
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    I don’t want big name celebrities doing voice over for animated movies. Give me actual VAs

  • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    modern movies suck today because Hollywood stopped telling stories and started selling fantasies.

    take for example two movies that are somewhat similar, Falling Down (1993) and Law Abiding Citizen (2009).

    In FD the audience spends 75% of the movie following a guy around who is clearly not well. he’s the antihero that we all sometimes wish we could be, but we also acknowledge it’s moralistically unjust to just go around blowing shit up and shooting at people. towards the end of the movie you understand the real cause of why he was acting the way he was which made his character even more relatable. it made you question our society and the cruel realities that everyday people survive. it makes you think that maybe that “pocket protecting pencil pusher” has more in common with you than you’d like to admit.

    In LAC the audience is immediately jarred by a violent sexual event that charges you with a desire for revenge. The rest of the movie is about a guy taking that revenge and getting some sadistic pleasure from it. you aren’t supposed to relate to the main character, or any character in the entire movie. everyone is shitty except for his dead wife and kid. The premise of the entire movie is to make the audience feel good that “justice” is being administered and sugar coats it in a high fructose action syrup. by the end of the movie you’re filled with rage of the injustices within our own world and feel as if you have been wronged like the main character. you spend the rest of the night imagining your own revenge if you were the main character.

    FD tells the story of how far a broken man will go if he has everything taken from him.

    LAC sells the fantasy that revenge is action packed and you will always win if your cause is righteous and just.

    that said, don’t get me wrong. I liked both movies, but I’m not going to lie to myself and say that LAC isn’t just revenge porn.

    modern movies are flat and simple because audiences lack the mental capacity they used to have. this is because we no longer watch them for entertainment, we watch to escape our own realities.

    edit: oh yeah and sound engineers can suck fucking dick if they can’t understand how to level out the foreground, background, and vocals for a regular not action movie. I’m tired of reading subtitles.

  • MousePotatoDoesStuff@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    3 days ago

    Cinematic universes shouldn’t live forever. At some point, there is just too much of it, both for people making it and for people watching it.

    • allidoislietomyself@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      I think it’s more that we turned cinematic universes into a forced content machine to have x number of side character movies per year, with one major tentpole event every few years, with tv shows, video games, and comics all filing in gaps along the way. It’s exhausting. I’m fine with a connected universe that is allowed to live and breathe in it’s own.

    • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Warm Bodies is an homage to the Shakespeare Cinematic Universe. Just, with zombies.

      How old is the Shakespeare Cinematic Universe? Does it count if it started out live-action?

    • HubertManne@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      my wife said something akin to this in a discussion we had. I was saying how I mostly use video as background and rarely pay attention to it now.

  • Mac@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    77
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 days ago

    I genuinely do not want to see famous actors in any media, at all. I don’t want to recognize anyone in a movie.

    • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      42
      ·
      4 days ago

      My son is big cinephile, and he complains about how contemporary movies are all filled with people who look like nepo-baby actors. He says they all have iPhone face: no matter what time period they’re supposed to be in, they all look like they’ve seen an iPhone.

      He longs for the old days when older unattractive actors were in demand as character actors.

    • Eq0@literature.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      I always find the first moments of movies with famous actors disconcerting. Why is Jack from Titanic here? Oh, he is not Jack from Titanic, just has his body-suit…

    • VitoRobles@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      4 days ago

      Which is why I can’t stand Will Smith movies. Or Vin Diesel. Or any of the other dozen actors who don’t actually go out of their way and act.

    • massive_bereavement@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      4 days ago

      The Bear had an episode with a family reunion where everyone was a famous actor, so you have some familiarity with them, but they were so characterized, it wasn’t off-putting.

      I do agree though those actors that are always the same persona (e.g. The Rock), do throw me away from what I’m watching.

  • glimse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    3 days ago

    I didn’t think One Battle After Another was very good. Felt like my generation’s Crash, though not nearly as bad

      • glimse@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Crash was absolutely trash, this movie was at least watchable. It’s admittedly a really unfair comparison.

        The reason I make it is because I feel the movie is getting a lot of praise because of what it’s “about” - and I use that word lightly because it’s not really…about anything. It’s just the pretense for the movie.

        The movie opens with a revolutionary group raiding an ICE detention center to free people.

    • MerryJaneDoe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      The resistance was just entirely too goofy. It felt like 3 scenes from Dumb and Dumber were shoehorned into an action/thriller.

      Good bones, though. It was a solid idea. Sean Penn and Teyana Taylor are absolutely unforgettable as Lockjaw and Perfidia.

      • glimse@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I agree…what was the resistance fighting for? Why did we spend 45 minutes watching them fuck shit up with no explained goal?

        All of the performances were great but Lockjaw was a stupid fuckin character. Hated the twist with him and hated the plot around it which…was apparently the ONLY plot because nothing else really happens.

        Which feels weird to say because there was so much going on in the movie. But there’s only so much going on because everything in the movie exists for a single purpose and then it goes away. Every character has a single motivation.

        I’m particularly mad because I walked in expecting to love it after several people whose movie opinions I almost always agree with told me they loved it. But I don’t love it, I’m neutral on it at best.

    • FatVegan@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      I tried watching LOTR ever since it’s out on DVD. I never finished one. It’s so boring, i don’t know what it is. Last time someone tried to show me the enhanced super long edition and it was absolutely painful and we both fell asleep.

      • masta_chief@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Watch in a theater if there’s an event near you or with a bunch of friends. The theatrical cuts are much better paced. It was even criticized for being much faster than the books. If you get to the Mines of Moria (1/2 of the way through the first) and you’re not hooked then it’s not for you. LoTR is movie magic. Not just “wow that was a great movie” but something that transcends the medium, and makes you ask, “HOW did they DO that?” Hope you give it another shot. Cheers

  • NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    I cannot stand The Godfather. Any mafia shit, really. I hate the whole family hierarchy thing, I hate the guise of freedom when it’s just an organization reminiscent of cops or the military, and I hate the blind loyalty to a system that only serves one person or family, it’s all just so petty and capitalistic, the mafia is fucking stupid.

    • BackgrndNoize@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Yeah thats what you were supposed to take away from that movie, the creator of it isn’t trying to glorify that life but show you how pathetic it is. But idiots watch it and take the wrong message

      • Katana314@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 days ago

        As is the typical pattern.

        “So you see, the lesson is that Gatsby’s pursuit of wealth only kept him further from-“
        “Dude, that guy’s parties were AWESOME! He had like a freaking circus there and all! What minority group do I have to brutalize to be like him??”

    • FatVegan@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      That’s why the sopranos is pretty good. They are just pathetic overweight old guys who have no connection to italy, but try really hard to pretend they have.

      Even better is that a certain kind of group still think they are bad ass, because they kinda fail to see the point.

      • NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        You say that like I’m obligated to appreciate the film just because it claims to be critical of the mafia and if I don’t like it then I just didn’t get it. That’s not the case, I get it. I don’t like those films either, and yes, it’s because they’re army movies. Regardless of being critical of the subject material, you cannot make a movie entirely about the mafia (let alone, three of them), or the army, or anything, without romanticizing the subject matter. Do you have any idea how many people saw The Godfather and fell in love with the idea of the mafia, or Full Metal Jacket and Apocalypse Now and fell in love with the idea of being in the military, or SLC Punk and fell in love with the idea of being a poser? All those people fucking loved those movies. Some people missing the point doesn’t mean that everyone who gets the point is obliged to think a movie is good. The Godfather fucking sucks, because it’s about stupid people doing stupid things and sucking their own dicks about it.

        • [object Object]@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Sounds like you want films to be only about sunshine and daisies.

          you cannot make a movie entirely about the mafia (let alone, three of them), or the army, or anything, without romanticizing the subject matter.

          Way too bold a claim.

          • NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            Sounds like you don’t understand different tastes and perspectives. I never said that that is inherently a bad thing, I just hate movies focused on military and authoritarian conformity and hierarchy as their main appeal, which is what the mafia is. As I said, I think the mafia is fucking stupid, I’m not asking for movies to be sunshine, I’m saying I don’t give a fuck about stupid mafia bullshit and glorified tales of such. Same goes for hoorah military shit. I’m not even saying it shouldn’t have been made, I just don’t like it, that was the point of this whole post. You can like the movie regardless of how stupid I think it is, art is subjective.

            And creating a movie is a glorification of its materials, no matter the intent behind the creator. Just look at Fight Club, SLC Punk, Wall Street, The Punisher, Lolita, Full Metal Jacket, The Joker, etc… That’s not negotiable.

            • [object Object]@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              Ah, so ‘District 9’ glorifies refugee camps, ‘Black Mirror’ glorifies techno-authoritarianism, ‘Life Is Beautiful’ glorifies Nazi concentration camps, ‘Idiocracy’ glorifies abject stupidity, ‘One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest’ glorifies abusive psychiatric hospitals, ‘Soylent Green’ glorifies overpopulation?

              Your take was bizarre before, but with that comment it’s plain idiotic.

              • NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                10 hours ago

                You’re intentionally misinterpreting what I’m saying, and it shows. You know what I’m getting at, I’m not playing in to this purposely obtuse bullshitery. I don’t like The Godfather and have valid criticisms of the films, get the fuck over it.

                Also, you didn’t understand those movies and shows at all if you think those were the themes and subjects they were focusing on and exploring. Learn how to examine and interpret a story, you’re only seeing the metaphors, maybe watch some stuff on media literacy and film studies.

                • [object Object]@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 hours ago

                  This is laughable coming from a guy who wrote “creating a movie is a glorification of its materials, no matter the intent behind the creator. That’s not negotiable.” Learn to take your head out of your ass before talking shit.

        • MerryJaneDoe@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          One beautiful thing about art - and, for me, especially movies - is that they reveal truths within ourselves.

          The first time I saw Fight Club, the “true” meaning went WAY over my head. I was young, I just saw a cool action flick with a twist ending. To me, the message was Fuck the System. I grew up, though. I can now clearly see the deeper themes, like warning about toxic masculinity and groupthink.

          Similarly, Starship Troopers was a favorite of mine. I never understood the parallels to fascism when I was younger - I just rooted for Johnny and the gang.

          The Godfather and Apocalypse Now fall squarely into that same set of movies. These are all movies that I enjoyed when I was young, but the themes were just beyond me. And that’s OK. My point is that you are definitely NOT obligated to appreciate these films. But maybe you can understand why these films are studied and rewatched and discussed. At least part of the reason is because someone who saw a film 5 or 10 or 30 years ago is only just now starting to understand it.

    • yabai@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      Lookie here boys, we gots ourselves a tough guy. Hey, Rico, why don’t you show our friend what happens to tough guys round here. Maybe a little swim with the fishies will show him we ain’t so bad after all.