The average CEO of the US’s 100 largest, lowest-paying corporations earned 614 times more than their average worker last year, according to an analysis by the Institute for Policy Studies (IPS).

IPS’s latest executive excess report analyzed compensation at the 100 S&P 500 corporations with the lowest median worker pay. Between 2019 and 2025, CEO compensation increased 41.4%, unadjusted for inflation, twice as much as the median worker pay increased at these firms during the same period, at 20.7%.

Inflation also outpaced worker pay increases, rising by 25.9%.

The CEO-to-worker pay ratio at the low-wage 100 firms increased 8.4% between 2019 and 2025.

  • finallymadeanaccount@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    5 hours ago

    "The average CEO of the US’s 100 largest, lowest-paying corporations earned … "

    ‘Earned’. They worked a fiftieth as hard as their lowest-paid workers.

    • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I’ve always known that the idea of CEOs being compared to elite athletes was utter bullshit, but seeing fElon supposedly running SIX companies puts the lie to that notion. Even if he never slept, he’d be working 28 hours MAX per company. That’s not enough hours to even qualify for benefits for us hoi polloi. But fElon is special.

      Meanwhile, many companies won’t even let typical plebes moonlight on their own time for another company…but someone like fElon can operate six.

      Also, many of these motherfuckers sit on the boards of other companies, too. But you plebes: no moonlighting, that might violate something about your “loyalty” to the company!

  • Buffalox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    12 hours ago

    This has to end, nobody is worth that much. Even if they were, they shouldn’t have that much, because nobody needs that much.
    Billionaires are a symptom of a society that is sick.
    If there were no poor people, it would be more acceptable. But it will never be reasonable that some people make hundreds of times what other make on a full time job.

    • Earthwormjim91@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Almost none of these CEOs are billionaires though.

      The average CEO compensation among low-wage 100 corporations was $17.5m in 2025, compared with median worker pay of $36,571.

      • village604@adultswim.fan
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        12 hours ago

        That’s not taking their portfolio into account. A lot of CEO compensation isn’t in cash. Bezos only had like an $80k salary as CEO of Amazon.

        Also:

        The wealth of at least 36 billionaires is linked to these low-wage 100 corporations

        • Earthwormjim91@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          12 hours ago

          The wealth of the owners of the companies, sure.

          Like they explicitly mention Walmart. The Waltons don’t hold any executive positions at Walmart anymore. There’s a couple on the board of directors, but largely they just hold onto their stock.

          The CEO is a guy that started as an hourly employee in 1993, and his total compensation, including non-salary compensation and stock, is $29M.

          And yes, the article does take their total compensation into account. That’s stated in the report the article talks about.

          The average total CEO compensation of these 100 firms is $17M. That includes stock options and other perks.

          • architect@thelemmy.club
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 hours ago

            I just saw some other propaganda saying how Walmart house brands are directly competing now and are actually good because the grandkids are involved with the company at the product level. Lol the Walton’s don’t make any decisions when it’s convenient and the Walton’s are directly involved when convenient. Since I have no real way to confirm because at this point it takes literally seeing it with my own fucking eyes over and over and over for that i can’t believe anything any of you say. Fuck this world. Fuck the Walton’s and their stupid fucking kids. Fuck the ceo of Walmart. 17 million is still too much.

          • jtrek@startrek.website
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            12 hours ago

            The sequence as I understand it is

            • no one needs that much money
            • billionaires have more than that much money. They don’t need it.
            • you: none of the ceos are billionaires
            • me: fine, but they still don’t need that much money.

            If anything, you pointing out that the CEOs aren’t billionaires is a distraction from the point.

            • Earthwormjim91@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              11
              ·
              12 hours ago

              No, that’s just moving the goalposts.

              “Nobody should have a billion dollars”

              “These CEOs don’t”

              “Well they still make too much money!”

              • jtrek@startrek.website
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                8
                ·
                11 hours ago

                The initial goal post was “This has to end, nobody is worth that much.”, referring to CEOs making 614 times more than workers. Their wealth being in billions or millions was not mentioned. The goal post was not moved.

                • Earthwormjim91@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  7
                  ·
                  11 hours ago

                  The literal next comment is about how billionaires shouldn’t exist, putting a value on the aforementioned “they’re not worth that much”.

                  You can’t just ignore context to twist things how you want to lmao.

              • architect@thelemmy.club
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                10 hours ago

                Who gives a fuck?! Seriously! Who gives a fuck if someone is “moving the goalpost”. Are you having a debate?! Is your argument that this shit is okay? Do you need to come in and shit on everything for any particular reason?! Do you do this to people you know or does no one in real life listen to your annoying ass?

                No one is debating you. No one is arguing. People are fucking over it and sometimes they might be hyperbolic or exaggerate or get it not quite right but the point is fucking clear and I refuse to believe you people don’t know this.

  • Mulligrubs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Henry Ford was somehow able to squeak by on 50x his worker’s base salary.

    That, to me, would be a perfect cap on pay; also, all employed should have shares in the company in my opinion.

    Every limit is arbitrary, such is life. Sadly, as it is now, “no limit” is obviously not working, they just rape more workers every year with no end in sight, their greed is boundless.

    • Drusas@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      The stock market never should have been a thing to begin with.

  • Zacryon@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Imagine preparing a group presentation for class. One designs the slides and illustrations, one does research, one some hands-on stuff, and one coordinates, plans and manages the group.

    The presentation is a success. But the one who managed got the best grade, while the others got medium or bad grades.

    Doesn’t seem fair, or does it?

    This is capitalism in its current form.

    Everyone contributes to the success of the project, company, institution. Everyone depends on each other for it, so the value of labour is rather evenly distributed. But for some arbitrary reason, those at the top just skim the profits that is generated by those beneath them, instead of distributing fairly.

    There are companies that do it differently. With success. For example, https://www.wired.com/story/safetywing-remote-work-equal-salaries/

    Let’s keep aiming for this change.

  • tmyakal@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Just did the math, and my CEO only made 25x as much as me last year. But that’s not counting the stock he was given, because that’s not actually income, apparently.

  • Tiral@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Unfortunately people have zero willpower now a days. They couldn’t even get people to wear a damn mask for covid, bear case it saves your life, worst case omg it’s annoying wootie damn doo.

    If they won’t wear something that might have their life, you think they can stop buying soda and Doritos?