The average CEO of the US’s 100 largest, lowest-paying corporations earned 614 times more than their average worker last year, according to an analysis by the Institute for Policy Studies (IPS).

IPS’s latest executive excess report analyzed compensation at the 100 S&P 500 corporations with the lowest median worker pay. Between 2019 and 2025, CEO compensation increased 41.4%, unadjusted for inflation, twice as much as the median worker pay increased at these firms during the same period, at 20.7%.

Inflation also outpaced worker pay increases, rising by 25.9%.

The CEO-to-worker pay ratio at the low-wage 100 firms increased 8.4% between 2019 and 2025.

  • jtrek@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    20 hours ago

    The sequence as I understand it is

    • no one needs that much money
    • billionaires have more than that much money. They don’t need it.
    • you: none of the ceos are billionaires
    • me: fine, but they still don’t need that much money.

    If anything, you pointing out that the CEOs aren’t billionaires is a distraction from the point.

    • Earthwormjim91@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      19 hours ago

      No, that’s just moving the goalposts.

      “Nobody should have a billion dollars”

      “These CEOs don’t”

      “Well they still make too much money!”

      • jtrek@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        19 hours ago

        The initial goal post was “This has to end, nobody is worth that much.”, referring to CEOs making 614 times more than workers. Their wealth being in billions or millions was not mentioned. The goal post was not moved.

        • Earthwormjim91@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          19 hours ago

          The literal next comment is about how billionaires shouldn’t exist, putting a value on the aforementioned “they’re not worth that much”.

          You can’t just ignore context to twist things how you want to lmao.

          • jtrek@startrek.website
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            19 hours ago

            Billionaires are a subcategory of people with too much money.

            But also what’s your point here? Just pedentry? Defending CEO wealth at this 614:1 ratio? Defending billionaires right to exist?

            • Earthwormjim91@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              19 hours ago

              But also what’s your point here?

              Getting basic fundamental facts from the linked article correct. That’s my point. You cannot have any argument to stand on if you start from a false position.

              • jtrek@startrek.website
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                17 hours ago

                You seem to have imagined a link between

                This has to end, nobody is worth that much. Even if they were, they shouldn’t have that much, because nobody needs that much.

                And

                Billionaires are a symptom of a society that is sick.

                as if they were trying to say that the people in the articles are billionaires. That’s illusionary. There’s a full stop.

                This

                will never be reasonable that some people make hundreds of times what other make on a full time job.

                Was the point. That some are only millionaires is irrelevant. Billionaire is a subtype of “too rich” used as an example.

                No fundamental facts are in error.

      • architect@thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Who gives a fuck?! Seriously! Who gives a fuck if someone is “moving the goalpost”. Are you having a debate?! Is your argument that this shit is okay? Do you need to come in and shit on everything for any particular reason?! Do you do this to people you know or does no one in real life listen to your annoying ass?

        No one is debating you. No one is arguing. People are fucking over it and sometimes they might be hyperbolic or exaggerate or get it not quite right but the point is fucking clear and I refuse to believe you people don’t know this.