most happy and healthy kids have a unique desire to learn and trying to suppress that is unhealthy

things like screen time, finish your plate, etc

screen time is just a limit on time to learn if the kid is using it for the right purposes which you should teach them to

“finish your plate” I was never told that as a kid and I devour anything that is given to me

  • Bluetreefrog@lemmy.world
    shield
    M
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    18 hours ago

    I left the post stand despite a report, but OP appears to be sealioning in the comments, so…locking.

  • Hanrahan@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 days ago

    wisdom at 18? fuck me, im 61 and the only thing I’m certain about is that humanity, myself included in that venn diagram, lacks any wisdom at all.

  • wolfeh@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 days ago

    Because many adults don’t acknowledge that they are a part of their kids’ learning expperience.

    They assume that kids will magically become smarter the second they turn 18, and don’t understand that kids have to be exposed to information and some adversity before then (ideally with guidance from parents) to learn enough.

    Social media is very addictive, because it’s designed that way… so let’s regulate the social media and their intentionally addictive practices, rather than blaming kids and ripping them away from some of the only “socialization” our society allows kids to have.

    “Go bike to your friend’s house” doesn’t work, because the last two generations have built eight-game highways everywhere.

    • osanna@lemmy.vg
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      considering the brain doesn’t stop maturing until at LEAST 25.

  • howler@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    3 days ago

    You dont appreciate how stupid you were until you are older. Then you realize you were stupid when you were younger, and are stupid now, but over different things. If this isnt a persons experience in life, they are almost certainly a Republican. (Joke… Mostly)

    This is because with a lot of things in life, you have to actually experience them to figure out if and how you could have handled it better. You dont regret everything you do, but the things you eff up, stick with you…

    Former stupid kid, current stupid middle ager.

    • _skj@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      If you don’t think you were an idiot 10 years ago, you haven’t learned enough in those 10 years

  • disregardable@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    56
    ·
    3 days ago

    The screens are designed to be addicting. That’s not hyperbole. They literally use data scientists to increase the amount of time and money you spend on them. The longer you scroll, the more time you’re playing the game, the more money the developers make on average. Online service providers don’t care about your wellbeing. Your parents do. Just like there’s more food than chips and cake, there’s more to life than being on a screen. Investing in long term hobbies, skills, and friendships won’t have the instant gratification to compete with a video game, but 10 years from now you will think back way more fondly on your hours skateboarding or learning to play guitar than the ones you lost online.

    • IAMgROOT@lemmy.wtfOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      26
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      depends on the way you use it

      as a kid, most of the times I WASNT playing video games but accessing free digital information

      and I could wire up an esp32 to a 3 inch display and it’d be a “SCREEN”

      and if you use a FOSS enviroment like graphene, this doesnt apply

      I “lost online” are you kidding me? I would be homeless and destitute right now if I didnt have the skills I learned from SCREENS as a kid

      all of this only applies if you consume TechSlop

      • fizzle@quokk.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        44
        ·
        3 days ago

        You’re totally amazing and stuff but I’m sure you realise that most kids aren’t using their devices to learn.

        Obviously, if a kid was reading wikipedia like you did then their parent would relax the screen time rule.

        I’m glad you dropped by to tell us all how special you are but I dont really understand the point of this post.

        • IAMgROOT@lemmy.wtfOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          21
          ·
          3 days ago

          teach them how to use the devices to learn all kids and humans in general have curiosity that needs to be unlocked with wisdom

          teach them to use foss

          teach them to read wikipedia and github/codeberg

          dont limit, add

          • fizzle@quokk.au
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            33
            ·
            3 days ago

            Wow you just solved parenting. I cant believe everyone else is so stupid. Amazing.

          • AskewLord@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            16
            ·
            3 days ago

            they don’t. most people have zero curiosity and don’t want to learn.

            you’re projecting your own experience. and besides, what you want to learn is probably very tiny slice of what is out there and there are plenty of things others want to learn you don’t or think is stupid.

            • Amnesigenic@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              2 days ago

              This is 100% bullshit, most people enjoy learning when it’s presented in an engaging manner. Modern western education systems are not designed to facilitate learning in a natural and enjoyable way, they are designed to psychologically brutalize normal humans into a state of submission sufficient to keep them laboring quietly and profitably for the rest of their lives.

            • IAMgROOT@lemmy.wtfOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              14
              ·
              3 days ago

              I doubt that humanity would survive pretty long then

              humans are born with curiosity and want to learn

              and I do not think anything is stupid until I learn about it

              • AskewLord@piefed.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                17
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                3 days ago

                how old are you? you argue like a 16 year old.

                a bunch of grandiose statements that are mostly your own projects of yourself into the world.

                the irony being that your commentary in this thread prove that you are unwise and inexperienced in the world, and that young people are not wise. and you feel like your some counter-example, but all you are showing is you are a perfect example of and arrogant teenager who thinks lacks the maturity to understand the world exists outside of themselves and their experiences are incredibly limited.

              • moondoggie@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                3 days ago

                Are humans born with curiosity, or does curiosity need to be unlocked with wisdom? You’ve said both now.

          • IAMgROOT@lemmy.wtfOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            16
            ·
            3 days ago

            this is a very new situation with various perspectives

            I am just giving you guys advice on how to deal with it as someone who specialises in “screens” and how they work

  • Fizz@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    3 days ago

    I dont really understand the question so correct me if im misinterpreting.

    Because (in most cases) kids lack wisdom even when they know a lot. The reason screen time is being limited is generally because they arent using it in healthy moderation. People arent telling kids to finish their plate when they have no issue finishing the plate.

    Kids do need the rules and guidance because they do not have the life experience to make proper value judgements for things a long time into the future. Some kids do but most do not.

  • AskewLord@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    because your front cortex doesn’t mature until your mid 20s.

    that’s what controls impulse control and long term thinking.

  • Amnesigenic@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    Part of it is arrogant bullshit stemming from a complete inability to accurately remember what the experience of being young was like. Most people suck ass at honest self-assessment at every stage of life, so they fall into the trap of thinking they and their cohort were different than “kids these days” and are unable to empathize with or relate to young people because of this.

    Part of it is that kids genuinely just aren’t fully developed neurologically, in ways that frequently lead to making shortsighted decisions with negative results. Unfortunately that’s still true way past 18, it’s an arbitrary threshold and the expectation that people should instantly stop acting childish at 18 is just as stupid as assuming that anyone younger than 18 is categorically incapable of making the right decisions for themselves.

    The specific examples you’re using have some reasonable claim to option 2 depending on the context. Even as adults most people struggle to some degree with eating healthy nutritionally balanced diets, and children generally have less self-discipline so it can be more of a problem for them. Forcing kids to eat things they don’t want is a bad idea though, you’ll just give them a complex about eating and make them hate that specific food forever. My parents rule was that I never had to finish anything I didn’t like, but I had to try at least one bite of everything before deciding I didn’t like it. Worked like a charm, I eat everything.

    Screen time is similar, plenty of adults struggle with regulating their gaming and social media usage, and the companies that make games and websites get paid more when people use their stuff more, so they have an incentive to design things to be addictive and predatory. Adults assuming that all screen time is bad for kids are stupid, but it is possible that an adult might recognize a predatory system that a child wouldn’t have any experience with and save them from being taken advantage of. Best practice is to actually pay attention to what’s on your kids’ screen and discuss it openly with them. Unfortunately a lot of adults don’t want to do that because it’s difficult, they default to either assuming all screen time is bad or to not trying at all, so their kids are either needlessly restricted in their growth or exposed to the worst the internet has to offer. Both bad.

    Tldr the adults you’re dealing with aren’t necessarily completely wrong but they’re probably still full of shit

  • buttmasterflex@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    3 days ago

    Knowledge and wisdom are not the same. Wisdom is knowledge compounded by experience. The examples you list are not wisdom, nor are they necessarily knowledge. They are parenting techniques with obvious flaws.

    As for 18 being the magic number, that’s pretty societally arbitrary. Sure, one is legally an adult at 18 in many societies, but that doesn’t mean they have life experience to amount to having wisdom. Many 18 year olds know enough to function in society, but they’re realistically still children from a developmental standpoint. There’s no magic age for anything.

  • IWW4@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    3 days ago

    Because they are.

    Hell there is a substantial number of people who stay allergic to wisdom their entire lives.

  • Steve@communick.news
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    3 days ago

    screen time is just a limit on time to learn if the kid is using it for the right purposes

    There is much learning to be had out in the real world also. A balance of the two is important. Limits should be in place if the kid naturally spends too much time on one or the other.

    “finish your plate” I was never told that as a kid and I devour anything that is given to me

    If you did it on your own, why would anyone ever tell you to do it?

    • IAMgROOT@lemmy.wtfOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      3 days ago

      Some people are good at one thing and some at the other

      if I placed simone biles infront of a dying ssd and asked her to solder wires to the infochips inside to recover data, itd be insane

      if I placed joe grand on a gynmastics field, expecting him to achieve an olympic jump, itd be insane

      and I didnt finish it first, or a lot of times. My parents just ate the rest themselves or threw it away.

      • Steve@communick.news
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        3 days ago

        Yes, over time one or more specializations will naturally emerge. But even then time should still be spent on other kinds of experiences and knowledge. A person who only knows one thing is both helpless in life, and a rather booring person. Always at least experiment with new things so if you need them in the future you aren’t completely clueless.

          • JakoJakoJako13@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            18
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            Socializing with strangers.

            Socializing within a group setting.

            Self preservation skills.

            Danger assessment skills.

            Fishing.

            • IAMgROOT@lemmy.wtfOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              12
              ·
              3 days ago
              1. the core basis of internet chats
              2. same
              3. enhancing your security online
              4. Cybersecurity
              5. why would I need that to live
              • JakoJakoJako13@piefed.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                12
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                3 days ago
                1. Completely different IRL.
                2. Completely different IRL.
                3. Completely different IRL.
                4. Completely different IRL.
                5. Do you not eat fish?

                Are you currently plugged into the matrix? Or are you living bag of water taking in oxygen and emitting CO2 like the rest of us? Are you seriously trying to downplay the value of IRL experience in favor of a terminally online life? If so you’re proving why the adults in you’re own question are right.

                • IAMgROOT@lemmy.wtfOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  10
                  ·
                  3 days ago
                  1. why would I meet total strangers irl where they can stab me instead of online meetups?
                • IAMgROOT@lemmy.wtfOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  6
                  ·
                  3 days ago
                  1. I outsource my fishing to fishermen

                  I go on plently walks a day, with my phone ofcourse and eat right you dont gotta be an outdoorsman to be healthy and happy

              • IAMgROOT@lemmy.wtfOP
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                3 days ago

                and who has a whole fishing lake in the average city nowadays

                its all barren brutalist concrete

          • Slowy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            17
            ·
            3 days ago

            The fact you don’t see the potential there on your own makes it clear that you have plenty of room to grow in your own wisdom

              • Slowy@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                12
                ·
                3 days ago

                Yes, my answer is the same. You are conflating learning with pure comprehension of factual information. Learning and knowledge and wisdom involve much more than that.

          • Steve@communick.news
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            3 days ago

            I can easily. What kind of environment do you have around? City, suburban, rural? Woods, plains, desert?

            5 universal skills would be: navigation, hazard detection, problem assesment and solving, self reliance, physical endurance.

            • IAMgROOT@lemmy.wtfOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              8
              ·
              3 days ago
              1. navigating the internet
              2. cybersecurity
              3. collaborations ie. github project or codeberg project
              4. cybersecurity
              5. you can do that with a good diet
              • Steve@communick.news
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                3 days ago

                I don’t get it.
                Did you reply to the wrong comment?
                None of that has anything to do with what I wrote?

  • queerlilhayseed@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    3 days ago

    The thing about wisdom is that it requires understanding, which is different from knowing. I can know a rule without understanding the motivation or underlying reasoning of the rule, and crucially, I can still follow the rule even if I don’t understand it. This is useful for children because there are a ton of things they don’t understand about the world that can hurt them if they’re not prepared for it. Take for example the rule: “look both ways before crossing the street”. It’s a rule that is taught to children because running into a street without looking out for cars can get kids killed. There are a million situations like this. Not all of them are as starkly life and death, but kids who have a good set of rules can move through the world more safely and comfortably than kids without, and they can learn rules faster than they can learn the underlying logic of them. That can and should come later.

    There are also rules that aren’t so good. I think “make sure you finish your plate no matter what” is a rule that arose from a well-meaning attempt to prevent food waste, but it’s a rough fit for the purpose and it can make it hard for children to develop their own understanding of their eating preferences. I wouldn’t give a child that rule, I would spend a little more effort coming up with a solution to make sure kids are getting the nutrition they need without resorting to such ham-fisted measures.

    Screen time rules are tricky, because we haven’t had constant access to screens for very long, and the way we interact with them (TVs to PCs to smartphones, to say nothing of the media landscape in which these devices are situated) is still changing rapidly. Parents are doing their best to keep up and it is overwhelming because nobody really knows what the best rule is. I think it’s easy to say “just do whatever’s best for your child” if you don’t have kids because it’s hard to grasp the true scope of the problem of parenting: there are simply too many threats or possible threats to a child’s well-being to individually tailor solutions to everything, and you as a parent, have to pick which areas require tailoring and which areas have sufficient rules to fall back on.

    I don’t think this is unique to children either. There are plenty of domains of knowledge where knowing a few good rules can make life a lot better even if you don’t understand the mechanisms behind them. I don’t drink pond water even though I am neither a microbiologist nor a public health expert. I wash veggies before I eat them, and I wash my hands before I eat. I take medications exactly as my doctor tells me to and I consult with them before changing things.

    You may be thinking at this point, “but I understand all of those rules, why should I follow rules I don’t understand?”. Fair question. For children especially, but also for humans in general, I think the knowing of a rule has to come before the understanding of the rule. Understanding is where nuance comes in. You know the saying “there’s an exception to every rule”? There are some people who take this to mean that rules can be shrugged off when inconvenient. These people are, largely, fools. The exceptions to rules can only really be identified when the rule and it’s motivation are clearly understood. Sometimes when I’m doing emergency repairs on a software system, I will ignore the usual rules about code merges in prod. This has backfired on me before, because I did not take the proper alternative precautions one should take when moving quickly, but most of the time I think my handling of exceptional cases has been pretty good, because I have a good understanding of why those rules exist, the problems they’re supposed to prevent, and when they can be safely(ish) broken.

    Which brings me to my final point about wisdom, or understanding. Knowing about a rule, or fact, or domain of knowledge can feel an awful lot like understanding. Most humans suffer under this delusion, in most areas of their lives, for the full duration of their lives. Understanding usually only comes when one is confronted with an undeniable refutation of what one thinks they know. And that always takes time. In most cases, on most subjects, it never happens and we go to our graves never knowing the full extent of our lack of wisdom. Usually the best we can do is sort of grasp around the edges of our towering ignorance and try to get a feel for where the contours are, and the better we can do that, the better we can at least guess about what we don’t understand, and I think that’s the closest to wisdom we can hope for.

  • PonyOfWar@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    3 days ago

    screen time is just a limit on time to learn if the kid is using it for the right purposes which you should teach them to

    Part of that is teaching them moderation. Spending 12 hours a day on a screen, even if “learning”, is not healthy.

      • PonyOfWar@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        3 days ago

        Well for one thing, those are 12 hours where you’re not moving whatsoever. Going outside, doing sports, talking to people in real life etc are all important for our physical and mental health.

          • PonyOfWar@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            3 days ago

            …And you’re constantly looking at that screen while moving? Obviously, nobody would count riding a bike with a speedometer screen as “screen time”.

          • Slowy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            3 days ago

            No, you have lost touch or you have never been in touch with the many possibilities and opportunities for growth and learning which exist outside of electronic devices. I am not remotely saying there is nothing of value online, or within technology. There is incredible value and a staggering amount of information (of various quality). But when you attain more wisdom you will see that that also applies to things outside of electronic devices and denying yourself that information and interaction is rejecting knowledge and personal growth.

            • IAMgROOT@lemmy.wtfOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              3 days ago

              I learn a bunch of stuff both online and offline

              assuming “outside electronic devices” includes their insides such as MCUs, MPUs, ICs, etc

              • Slowy@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                8
                ·
                3 days ago

                I do believe you have learned plenty outside of interacting with electronic devices. And I am not saying you have to leave your niche either, if you are fulfilled and stimulated that’s great.

                But to suggest that you can learn and understand everything within your tiny bubble is really demonstrating a lack of depth and wisdom… At least you should be able to understand and accept that you are choosing to disengage with a vast amount of knowledge that cannot be provided by your current sphere of interest. If you accept that, then that is a good start.

                It doesn’t mean your pursuit of knowledge is invalid or useless. But an important piece of growth that sometimes but not always comes with age is beginning to grasp the vastness of what you don’t know, how much is out there that you cannot even begin the comprehend.

                The other side of this is a bit physiological. You mentioned in another comment that may skills and concepts learned outdoors have analogues online (like navigating the internet). I just wanted to add that these are very different. Our brains have evolved for millions of years to navigate a physical environment and have unique mechanisms to do that based on vision, smell, even magnetic forces. The inherent attuning of our brains to the physical world is why things like using a mind palace technique for memory are so powerful. There are many other mechanisms like that which can’t always be exercised in a meaningful way via the internet or technology, and which contain their own opportunities for knowledge and growing ones understanding.