• Etterra@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    Scale the property tax exponentially based on the valuation of the property. Make sure the wealthy land owners pay more. Much, much more.

    • HubertManne@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      thats a good idea. A progressive property tax. I sorta can’t believe it never occured to me and I never saw it mentioned previously. Would encourage affordable housing building I think to.

      • callouscomic@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        A large building with a lot of rentals would be taxed at a high total value, and this increased cost would be passed on to renters, thereby defeating the purpose. It should o ly apply to unrented properties.

        Side note, I know nothing about rent control though.

        • rushmonke@ttrpg.network
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          and this increased cost would be passed on to renters

          Wrong. Renters are already paying the most the market will bear.

      • TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        No, it wouldn’t. It would discourage development and would encourage people to let their properties languish to lower their assessed values.

        The current system works because generally you do not pay more for more expensive property, you pay a flat rate based on the assessed value. And there are abatement for certain identity and income groups already that serve as a progressive measure. Low income and senior residents most typically get the biggest tax breaks already.

        • AbackDeckWARLORD@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          properties languish to lower their assessed values.

          you do not pay more for more expensive property, you pay a flat rate based on the assessed value

          How is that possible for assessed value to be one way but not the other? Assessed properties have to do with the value of the property. It’s not 1:1 but it is definitely correlated.

          • TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 days ago

            because people are not rational. they are emotional.

            and they are VERY emotional about taxes to the point they do stupid crap. a lot of people are very fearful of taxes to the point they make really crazy choices based on that fear.

            my own sister is going to move to some rural shitty state, because she is so afraid of paying taxes once she retires. especially property taxes. and when i point out the irony of that when she gets sick there will be zero medical services… she tells me to go fuck myself. she has this delusional belief that if she lives in a cabin in bumfuck nowhere then her life will be amazing because she won’t be paying taxes as much.

            • hector@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 days ago

              If you don’t have money to pay property taxes they seize your property and auction it off. All while costs are skyrocketing, and people on fixed incomes aren’t getting more money. To dismiss your sister’s fear is wrongheaded, she’s right on this unless she has a lot saved up, social security is worth less in real value every year, as real inflation averaged 5-8%/year under the old, and more honest, standard, just by 2008 for the 50 years prior, and stated inflation in the cpi that it’s all based on had it’s formula changed several times to keep it around 2-3%. The difference is 1,300 dollars a month social security recipients are now denied from those changes to the cpi, on average.

              So costs can go up so they can’t afford to eat and pay bills and keep a car, and pay property taxes. Plus the county/township can come in and change the valuation of the property, raise the millages, etc.

              Losing your property as a retiree is catastrophic, I would say you are way off base scorning your sister’s very real concerns here.

              • TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                4 days ago

                Yeah, none of that is true. My sister is objectively an idiot, she has millions of dollars and her fear is founded by ‘taxes are theft’ beliefs. Her SS benefit will be like 5-6 grand a month no top of all her already crazy money. she is a millionaire.

                I worked in tax policy. It takes years of willful neglect to get your property seized. Like 10 years of not paying your taxes, and even then most municipalities have programs to make payments on tax debts.

                • hector@lemmy.today
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  4 days ago

                  It takes 3 years here to get your property seized and auctioned.

                  And not making enough money might seem like “willful neglect” to you, reared on fox news campaigns blaming the poor for getting cheated by society out of a dignified life, one they had before the 80s.

                  But the jokes on you, and all of us, because they are coming for all of our money, you just didn’t see through or care when they manipulated you into supporting it.

                  Even as they cheat you every day in the understated inflation, unless you have investment income. It’s your own fault I’m sure. Stupid others, not having enough money, it’s clearly a choice and a personal failing they are getting cheated by a society seized by big business and run by nihilistic lawyers working for billionaires.

              • Mulligrubs@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                4 days ago

                Please forgive tubulartittyfrog, as you can plainly see, they are emotional and get angry when math doesn’t match their stupid crap feelings

  • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.caOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    This is how you do it when you’re serious about achieving what you promise for your constituents. Use your tools as needed, demand cooperation, when you don’t get it, use your tools as leverage. Even if you fail, people see you did what you could and then they’re ready to punish whoever stood in your way at the ballot box. This is why the oligarch class is so afraid of Mamdani who’s just a mayor.

    • errer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      Uh doesn’t this just inflict pain on the middle class if it ends up passing?

        • vortic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 days ago

          And you think land lords won’t pass increased property taxes on to their tenants?

          I don’t live in NYC so I won’t give an opinion on this but landlords won’t just eat increased taxes.

          • porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 days ago

            No, in a market like NYC rents are already the maximum that the market can bear, and a lower percentage of property prices than elsewhere. Landlords in fact will eat at least part of the increased taxes because the only other option is to not rent the property. That’s exactly why they’re so upset about it.

          • iopq@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 days ago

            Property taxes are paid by the renters. Landlords don’t have any money other than rent. This is a tax on tenants with extra steps

            • FauxLiving@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 days ago

              Landlords don’t have any money other than rent. This is a tax on tenants with extra steps

              The landlords that this is targeted against are not the slightly rich guy who owns an apartment building, it’s people like Citadel LLC who has nearly $70 Billion dollars of assets under management, a large portion of which are rental properties.

              Those landlords have the money to pay the taxes. They own much more expensive properties, many of which are held empty and are limited in how much they can raise their prices indirectly, due to them already charging as much as the market will bear and also directly by Mamdani freezing rents.

              In addition, many wealthy people in NYC own expensive housing (including Trump) that they use and do not rent.

    • homes@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      It’s a little bit misleading to refer to as any mayor of New York City as “just a mayor“.

  • Fedizen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    Its so funny the NYT has like half a dozen quotes about people opposed to the tax hikes but not a single one has presented a real idea for alternatives.

      • Pyr@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        Are there middle class property owners in New York city?

        I feel like middle class would all be renters there and upper class wealthy the only actual owners.

  • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    Better pass a rent freeze first or that property tax increase will just get passed on to the people who can afford it least.

  • BigBolillo@mgtowlemmy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    Communism is fun until there is no more someone else’s money for free handouts.

    I adapted it but it’s still valid I guess.

    Expect companies to flee the state just as happened in LA.

    • Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      Where do you think those billionaires got their money?

      spoiler

      Its all Someone Else’s Money

      New York as a whole has ridiculous taxes because of insane police budgets and corruption allowing stuff like ambulance companies charging the state 3K/trip for non-emergency weekly dialysis visits.

      Which is weirdly similar to California which you’d think was a communist utopia the way rightwingers talk about it.

      • iopq@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 days ago

        If I sell you a thing, it’s no longer your money, it’s my money. You get a thing that is now your thing.

          • iopq@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 days ago

            Jeff Bezos started Amazon and worked to expand it for decades. The company didn’t make a profit for something like 20 years (but kept raising money and expanding). Sounds like labor to me

              • iopq@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                3 days ago

                They were paid the wage they signed the contract for. Underpaid scoring to whom?

                • Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  The difference between the wealth they created and the wealth they received was still the product of their labor, not Jeff Bezos. Do you think Lockheed shareholders got us to the moon, and not ya know, the engineers and scientists?