• Etterra@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    Scale the property tax exponentially based on the valuation of the property. Make sure the wealthy land owners pay more. Much, much more.

    • HubertManne@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      thats a good idea. A progressive property tax. I sorta can’t believe it never occured to me and I never saw it mentioned previously. Would encourage affordable housing building I think to.

      • callouscomic@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        A large building with a lot of rentals would be taxed at a high total value, and this increased cost would be passed on to renters, thereby defeating the purpose. It should o ly apply to unrented properties.

        Side note, I know nothing about rent control though.

        • rushmonke@ttrpg.network
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          and this increased cost would be passed on to renters

          Wrong. Renters are already paying the most the market will bear.

      • TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        No, it wouldn’t. It would discourage development and would encourage people to let their properties languish to lower their assessed values.

        The current system works because generally you do not pay more for more expensive property, you pay a flat rate based on the assessed value. And there are abatement for certain identity and income groups already that serve as a progressive measure. Low income and senior residents most typically get the biggest tax breaks already.

        • AbackDeckWARLORD@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          properties languish to lower their assessed values.

          you do not pay more for more expensive property, you pay a flat rate based on the assessed value

          How is that possible for assessed value to be one way but not the other? Assessed properties have to do with the value of the property. It’s not 1:1 but it is definitely correlated.

          • TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 days ago

            because people are not rational. they are emotional.

            and they are VERY emotional about taxes to the point they do stupid crap. a lot of people are very fearful of taxes to the point they make really crazy choices based on that fear.

            my own sister is going to move to some rural shitty state, because she is so afraid of paying taxes once she retires. especially property taxes. and when i point out the irony of that when she gets sick there will be zero medical services… she tells me to go fuck myself. she has this delusional belief that if she lives in a cabin in bumfuck nowhere then her life will be amazing because she won’t be paying taxes as much.

            • hector@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 days ago

              If you don’t have money to pay property taxes they seize your property and auction it off. All while costs are skyrocketing, and people on fixed incomes aren’t getting more money. To dismiss your sister’s fear is wrongheaded, she’s right on this unless she has a lot saved up, social security is worth less in real value every year, as real inflation averaged 5-8%/year under the old, and more honest, standard, just by 2008 for the 50 years prior, and stated inflation in the cpi that it’s all based on had it’s formula changed several times to keep it around 2-3%. The difference is 1,300 dollars a month social security recipients are now denied from those changes to the cpi, on average.

              So costs can go up so they can’t afford to eat and pay bills and keep a car, and pay property taxes. Plus the county/township can come in and change the valuation of the property, raise the millages, etc.

              Losing your property as a retiree is catastrophic, I would say you are way off base scorning your sister’s very real concerns here.

              • TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                4 days ago

                Yeah, none of that is true. My sister is objectively an idiot, she has millions of dollars and her fear is founded by ‘taxes are theft’ beliefs. Her SS benefit will be like 5-6 grand a month no top of all her already crazy money. she is a millionaire.

                I worked in tax policy. It takes years of willful neglect to get your property seized. Like 10 years of not paying your taxes, and even then most municipalities have programs to make payments on tax debts.

                • hector@lemmy.today
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  4 days ago

                  It takes 3 years here to get your property seized and auctioned.

                  And not making enough money might seem like “willful neglect” to you, reared on fox news campaigns blaming the poor for getting cheated by society out of a dignified life, one they had before the 80s.

                  But the jokes on you, and all of us, because they are coming for all of our money, you just didn’t see through or care when they manipulated you into supporting it.

                  Even as they cheat you every day in the understated inflation, unless you have investment income. It’s your own fault I’m sure. Stupid others, not having enough money, it’s clearly a choice and a personal failing they are getting cheated by a society seized by big business and run by nihilistic lawyers working for billionaires.

                  • TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    4 days ago

                    Dude, i worked professionally in tax policy for awhile w/ the people who write the laws and enforce them.

                    But please tell me how my talking points are from fox news… lol

              • Mulligrubs@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                4 days ago

                Please forgive tubulartittyfrog, as you can plainly see, they are emotional and get angry when math doesn’t match their stupid crap feelings