Example: I believe that IP is a direct contradiction of nature, sacrificing the advancement of humanity and the world for selfish gain, and therefore is sinful.

Edit: pls do not downvote the comments this is a constructive discussion

Edit2: IP= intellectal property

Edit3: sort by controversal

  • Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    I thought of a few stupid things, but everyone talking about kids made me think of this one.

    I am strongly against Trickle down suffering.

    “I put up with this terrible thing when I was your age, and even though we could stop it from happening to anyone, it’s important that we make YOU suffer through it too.”

    Hazing, bullying, unfair labor laws, predatory banking and more. It’s really just the “socially acceptable” cycle of abuse.

    • phanto@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      I agree, and I take it this far: “I worked hard and paid for my house, why should some lazy loafer get housing for free? I paid 24,000$ in tuition, why should kids get free college?” I think that, at some point, one guy has to be the first guy to benefit from progress, and all the people who didn’t benefit just have to suck it up. I would 100% pay a much higher tax rate if it meant that homelessness was gone, hunger was gone, kids got free education… I’m Canadian, so I don’t need to say this about health care. Yeah, I paid an awful lot of mortgage, but if someone else gets a free house? Good!

    • lath@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      I sort of disagree. Some pain and suffering is what helps some people become better versions of themselves. Doesn’t work for everyone though, so it shouldn’t be the default experience, but rather a last resort.

        • lath@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          Nah mate, it’s the “rich ppl need to experience poverty in order to empathize” argument.

      • lgmjon64@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        Yes, facing adversity does build resilience. However, creating adversity for another just because YOU had to face it is wrong. I had a professor who called our career a “brotherhood of suffering” and would purposely create artificial stumbling blocks and make things more difficult because he had the same done to him. It’s perpetrating a cycle of abuse. I’ve now gotten to the point where I’ve taught in university and in the hospital and I try to break that cycle. It’s still a very difficult path, the content and pace are still taxing. Many still don’t make it to graduation, why make it harder then it needs to be?

      • WR5@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        I agree with OP, and I think you may as well but are stating it differently. Hardships and difficulty so indeed provide the opportunities to better oneself, but that shouldn’t come from contrived abuse like bullying or hazing. Those are instances of someone using their previous difficulty as an excuse to make it harder for someone else which I don’t believe is morally correct.

        • lath@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          Maybe, maybe not. My thought for the comment was “tried to help, didn’t work, off you go and experience as is”.

          Because not everyone learns the same way, so we can’t apply a fix-all universal method. Some kids, adults even, don’t get it until they experience it themselves.

          What that “it” is changes from person to person and every time we think “why don’t they just understand”, maybe it’s that they can’t understand and need a different way of learning “it”. Which sometimes is painful.

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      I mean, it definitionally is. Even if you use a less charged synonym like “body modification of a major part”.

      The normative/moral take would be that all genital mutilation is bad.

    • andros_rex@lemmy.worlddeleted by creator
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      The big thing is just not comparing it to female circumcision. Both are fucked up, but female circumcision is done explicitly to destroy sexual function. It’s rare for male circumcision to go so wrong that all sexual function is lost, but that’s the goal of female circumcision.

  • kreskin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    Being “proud” of your acheivements is fine.

    Being “proud” of your country or your state or your football team that you’re not a member of,or your ethnicity is douchebaggery.

    • MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      My mam has a union jack she flies outside her house. I always say “do you forget what country you live in?” To her all the time about it

  • RedFrank24@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    If you’re a juror and you vote guilty, knowing that the person you’re voting guilty for will be executed, if they are later found not guilty, your head should be next on the chopping block.

    I am fundamentally against the death penalty. It is not a power the government should ever have.

  • traches@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    Absolute free speech is overrated. You shouldn’t be able to just lie out your ass and call it news.

    The fact that the only people who had any claim against Fox for telling the Big Lie was the fucking voting machine company over lost profits tells you everything you need to know about our country

    • SuperNovaStar@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      While I’m tempted to agree, the big problem here is that if the government can decide that some speech is illegal, they can use that to silence people they don’t like.

      Obviously the system we’ve got now in the US isn’t working, but we need to tread carefully when giving the government power to decide what is or isn’t the “right beliefs”.

  • Snowclone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    Death penalty is wrong. Also vengeance prison is wrong, VERY unpopular opinions. I can’t tell you how many people will full on yell at you if you say this in public. I think rehab prison is what should happen for any prisoner that isn’t in for murder one or rape, domestic abuse. Financial crimes? House arrest, monitored assets, no access to exploitable systems. Property crime? Make sure they have a legitimate job, parole, house arrest if serious, garnished wages. We could have the vast majority of prisoners on parole or house arrest and in treatment, or jobs programs and out prison population would be at a normal percentage compared to the rest of the world.

  • TwoBeeSan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Killing yourself is ok. You don’t know what it’s like to be them and be in their head.

    I’ll never do it. Even in darkest depths, but respect anyone’s right to say peace out.

    • kautau@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      Agreed. The idea that you owe people your life is pretty nuts. At the end of the day, you can be robbed of everything, including your life. But it’s the one thing you’re not allowed to end. In a perfect world I do think that people who are suicidal should both:

      (a) have to discuss their suicide with a trained professional. What does this look like? Idk. But probably along the lines of “are you capable of healing / can we heal what is causing these thoughts or no?”

      (b) be able to get professional euthanasia. No pain, someone to be there with them through the process. Not just a sterile room where you go to die, but a place you are going to leave your pain behind and move on

      If there is an afterlife, hopefully they find peace there.

  • FairycorePhoebe@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    There is no utility in punishment. Wanting people who wronged you to suffer isn’t a desire for justice, but a desire for revenge. Dangerous people can be stopped from hurting others without locking them in cages or treating them poorly.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      That cats should remain indoors.

      In my experience, humans do tend to prefer this policy but cats do not. Consequently, outdoor cats tend to be cats that are particularly good at getting outside in defiance of their owners’ interests - either by physical escape or social manipulation.

      • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Are the cats wanting to be outside, or are they just wanting to be away from you?

        Cause I’ve never had a cat that wanted to be outside. Sit in a window and watch the world, yes, but as soon as you give them the ability they ran and hid.

  • Lovable Sidekick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    I agree with your attitude about IP. For tens of thousands of years humans freely imitated every good idea they saw, in a process known as “the spread of civilization”. But then somebody figured out how to make shitloads of money by producing copies of other people’s work and paying them a pittance, aka “royalty”, and suddenly copying and imitation became immoral.

  • Lightor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Against IP as in if I spend my life creating something you’d be ok with a big company just stealing it and steam rolling me?

    • mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Personally, I’d be against corporate owned IP. Leave the IP with the individual artists and writers, who are historically shit on by the large companies. Force the massive companies to actually keep the artists and writers around (and pay them well!) if they want to continue using an IP.

  • HexesofVexes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    The purpose of an education is to learn how to think, not how to work.

    A lot of universities are being treated as training centers for the world of work - and this is not ok.

  • Norin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Pacifism.

    The overwhelming majority of people, no matter where they sit in terms of culture, religion, and politics, see total nonviolence as a naive position.

    But it’s among my most deeply held beliefs.