cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/47972724

i encountered this for the first time today while attempting to read something on archive.today.

i confirmed that decoding the qrcode using a computer and following the URL it contains is insufficient; the error it gave directed me here which is what the linked screenshot is of.

the old type of captcha remains available too, for now:

screenshot of text: Important: Mobile verification for Google Cloud Fraud Defense is an experimental challenge type in Preview. Visual and audio challenges are available as alternatives for users who can't complete mobile verification. To use them, click the Visual  or Audio  buttons.

  • TrackinDaKraken@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 hour ago

    I still won’t order online from a store that won’t show me shipping cost without a full address and phone number. I’ll give them the zip code, that’s all they need, that’s all they get before I decide.

  • MalReynolds@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 hour ago

    FWIW I’ve found passing it through my local SearxNG usually gives me a clean path to the content. But it’s seriously worrying that some of the blocked content is publically available science (e.g. PMC Bioinformatics). But that should not be necessary, at this point a search engine should be a public resource. Fuck Google.

    • TrackinDaKraken@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      This is the only way to stop it. We must refuse to use it. All they watch is the numbers.

      I bought a thing from Walmart using pickup for the first time, because the thing was “low stock”, and I didn’t want to drive there if they didn’t have it. I get the email that it’s ready, and they want me to download their stupid app to confirm. Fuck that, I went to the store, knowing I had a backup option, and found the last one of the thing on the shelf and bought that instead. Although, apparently the sign at the parking spot has a phone number you can call to let them know you’ve arrived–no mention of that option in the email.

  • 0_o7@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    8 hours ago

    We are making side loading harder because scammers are using “these” tactics to install malware on your devices.

    It’s totally fine when we use the same tactics to install malware on your device.

    • The D Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 hours ago

      malware is bytecode Google didn’t approve of. when google spies on you, that’s just “legitimate interest”

  • Renat@szmer.info
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    12 hours ago

    I once saw fake captcha scam that reuired scaning QR code to infect device. It looks exactly like that.

    • lemmylump@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I once made QR code stickers that placed people on a website warning them to stop trusting QR codes.

      I spent a year traveling and everywhere I saw a QR code my sticker QR code went over it.

      You target the right locations and spoof the website and you can get credit card, phone, email, address. Svan this QR code for 20% off blah blah blah.

      Do use them.

      • Buckshot@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Noticed parking meters here have prominent labels now stating they do not use QR codes. I’m sure that’s just providing the spot to put the scam QR code, but it’s better than nothing.

      • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Sign: “Scan here for a trail map”

        lemmylump: “I better vandalize this. Guys I’m tooootally helping people.”

    • IratePirate@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Just like Recaptchas haven’t been a challenge to bots for a long time. Still, we had to deal with this shit. Makes you wonder if it’s just a stupid fucking pretext… 🤔

        • IratePirate@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Used to be, yeah. But this part of computer vision has been a solved problem for a while now. Captchas still remained for the sole purpose of annoying the living fuck out of people like you and me. Well, until Google figured out Captchas could be weaponised for (gestures) whatever this is.

          • 520@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            10 hours ago

            Something like that. Emulators also give the ability to emulate cameras using pictures or video feeds.

            They just need to set up a Google play equipped emulator, set the picture as simulated camera input and put in the inputs to the emulator (also automatable)

          • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            11 hours ago

            May have to stream a video of the screen into a scanner app, but shouldn’t be difficult anyway.

            One of the forms of digital ID in use in my country now has a new way to use it, which the government websites use now. You always needed a mobile device for this one anyway (phone holds the private keys and you have to enter the PIN 1 or PIN 2 depending on whether you’re authenticating or authorizing something), but it used to be that you could enter your ID code and get prompted for the PIN (with a verification number to make sure you’re responding to the prompt you think you’re responding to), now it’s either on-device from the default browser to the app, OR on desktop you have to scan a QR code that’s a moving target, it changes a couple of times a second so you couldn’t send a screenshot to someone else to scan. This is meant to prevent scams where someone gets you to just enter your PIN over a phone call.

            I don’t know if the google thing is similar though or if it’s a static QR there.

      • Renat@szmer.info
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        12 hours ago

        My cat once jumped on keybard and wrote “ghfhghgghhfjgfhf” on Discord chat. The first non-human with acces to computer.

  • Formless Oedon@lemmy.mlB
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    11 hours ago

    On the bright side, this means they are really worried that privacy practices such as those popular among the Lemmy crowd can make their surveillance expensive or maybe even impractical at scale, rather than profitable. I’m never sure if it’s working, with firmware and all. Almost a good sign? Am I deluded?

  • antonim@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    14 hours ago
    1. Hype up AI.

    2. Everyone starts scraping the internet to obtain training data for their AI.

    3. To block the scrapers, countless sites implement stricter bot detection tools.

    4. The owners of the bot detection tools now effectively hold all of the internet by its throat, deciding who can access what and extorting more and more data from you to verify you’re human.

    Fucking genius.

  • BradleyUffner@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    17 hours ago

    No malicious site would ever fake this kind of flow in order to get someone to scan a dangerous QR code. Nope, that would never happen.

    • Scrollone@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      11 hours ago

      It’s already happening. They tell you to scan a QR code that links to a website where they ask you to log in with your Google account (but it’s just a phishing page).

      Good job Google!

  • Hemingways_Shotgun@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Any website that chooses to use this service will simply not get my traffic. If enough people feel the same, those websites will lose clicks and eventually tell Google to pound sand.

    Imagine the utter hubris on these fuckers to think that people will get a google device just to access a website.

    Or to think that an average user sitting at home would run to another room to grab their phone so they can verify themselves on the desktop just to visit blackcougar.com

    • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      1 year later

      Government website you have to use to pay your water bill: “Confirm you are a human…”

    • DFX4509B@lemmy.wtf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      They’re using the fact that everyone else both already owns a Google or iOS device, and does everything on those devices, to punish desktop and alt mobile OS users.

      The fact that this is going on right as AluminumOS is down the pipes, and right as rigged parts prices threaten to kill desktops as an option to begin with makes this especially sus.

      The way things are going right now, I won’t be surprised if we see a computing future where you’re either on a Google or Apple-controlled device, or you’re on a thin client tied to a cloud subscription, and you won’t own your tech anymore.

      Bezos’ ‘Give up your PC and rent from our cloud’ threat is sounding less and less like a threat and more and more likely to become reality.