90% of it is just misandrist bait, and its just an echochamber of misandry.

    • velma@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      Louder for the back!

      Misandry isn’t the reverse of misogyny. There’s no anti-men power structures being kept in place by women, there isn’t women-dominated governments stripping men of their rights, there’s no systemic violence against men perpetuated by women in power.

      There are certainly individuals that hate men, but misandry simply doesn’t exist the same way misogyny does.

      Thank you for your comment.

      • Sunsofold@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        To be precise, misandry exists, but it doesn’t have the same societal support that mysogyny does. Both exist, but one has a noticeable effect in the broader world where as the other mostly has effects only in limited spaces where the individual has enough control to override the default power imbalance.

        • velma@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Thank you for expanding on my comment.

          Institutional misandry doesn’t exist is the more precise parent statement.

      • jjagaimo@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        You’ve mistaken misogyny/misandry with patriarcy/matriarchy.

        Misandry is by definition the hatred of, distrust of, or prejudice against men, as misogyny is the same against women.