It’s a link to the album, so I’m not sure which song you mean, but I know one of his tracks was used for a game trailer at one point.

A search shows ‘His music has been used in a number of video games, movies and TV shows, including CSI, Love, Death & Robots, Silicon Valley, Furi, LittleBigPlanet 2, and Sleeping Dogs’ via wikipedia, and full OSTs for Killzone: Shadowfall and the movie Black Swan, which I hadn’t seen but now think I will have to.

Hmm, so much to choose from and so much I don’t even know about…

Visually, Beksinski has been one of the few that really triggers a resonance somewhere inside me.

The works of Jim Henson are also amazing, though I don’t know how one would ever categorize them. Part writing, part performance, part musical, part sculptural, part visual, and yet still other elements.

There’s a great deal of very good music as well, but one of the few where the music felt like ‘art,’ in a way I have some difficulty expressing, is Lorn. Something about it has a sense that it’s trying to say something in a language I feel like I’m supposed to understand, and almost can, but only almost.

Yes. One of the interesting findings of cognitive science is the human brain effectively uses an interlocutor as part of itself. This is why rubber ducky debugging works, and why people often use an internal version of the process when thinking through problems. Having a second point of view also helps prevent ‘lock in’ because the other person can notice things which are not perceived by the first.

Just to be precise, I did say median wage. Minimum wage would be a considerably lower threshold. (~$377k in the US) It’s mostly meant to let it scale over time with fluctuations and inflation rather than tie it to a particular outcome, though minimum might have it’s own benefits in some circumstances.

The conference example, however, is not an issue. If at the conference/convention as a paid/induced speaker, one would be made safe by the viewers’ choice to come to the talk, which may contain many individual pieces of media but would have them all clearly linked by being part of the presentation, unless they attempted to include disconnected media, which would open them up to prosecution. The viewers would clearly be seeking to see the presentation unless they were directed to the room with the promise of something else and were having the presentation foisted upon them by surprise, an unlikely possibility given most such events are closed, ticketed events with posted signage, and could be further ensured by a simple verbal preface. ‘I am Soandso McSuchnsuch and I am about to give a presentation on Blah. If you are expecting something else, please go now to prevent disruption during the presentation.’

If at the conference/convention as something like booth personnel, one would be obligated to wait until the visitors requested information but could then dispense the information freely.

And if at the conference/convention as a visitor, you would not be receiving payment, and would in fact be paying to be there, so you would be free from prosecution for the basic act of sharing stories with a colleague.

This is why I want to set a basic minimum to allow for the actual small businesses to have a chance. I have an idea that any ban should apply only to individuals or groups that have a gross revenue of greater than ~25x the annualized median wage. (by state if operating entirely within a US state, by national median if operating across state lines, etc.) It would let small businesses get the word out at the start but once they are making (based on 2023 data) ~$1M/yr, (enough to have multiple employees and maintain a healthy profit margin) they are doing enough business that they should be established and no longer need exemption.

Already had this discussion with people a dozen times.

Ban:

An individual or group providing money and/or goods and/or services to another individual or group to encourage or contract them to display, broadcast, or otherwise disseminate a piece of media or information to a third individual or group, in particular and/or in general, which the receiver/listener/viewer(s) has/have not specifically requested to receive.

Accepting, as an individual or as part of a group, money and/or goods and/or services by another individual or group to be encouraged or contracted to display, broadcast, or otherwise disseminate a piece of media or information to a third individual or group, in particular and/or in general, which the receiver/listener/viewer(s) has/have not specifically requested to receive.

Tying request of one piece of media to a noticeably disconnected/unrelated piece of media.

The ban on providing shall apply only to individuals or groups that have a gross revenue of greater than ~25x the annualized median wage for the smallest political jurisdiction which fully contains the territories they conduct business in. (For context, this would be ~$1,000,000 for a business in the US that conducts business across state lines)

Before we get to banning advertising though we first need to figure out how to connect people to businesses that have goods and services they actually want to seek out

No.

Advertising is malign. We don’t stop to consider how the poor cotton farmer will harvest his cotton before abolishing slavery. We don’t stop to consider how the lead mine owner will make a profit before we swap to unleaded fuel. We don’t stop to consider how the poor government officials will afford their expensive lifestyle before we ban bribes. We prevent the harm. If anyone is benefitting from harming people, losing out on that benefit is the most lenient punishment they should ever hope for.

Commercial speech is unprotected speech.

That’s not how pizza quality works. You wouldn’t eat a pizza with literal shit all over it and call it good because it was made by a saint.

The point is, that’s a preference, not an innate ‘better,’ I generally use librewolf myself, but when the list of ‘problems’ with the browser is a set of optional things that you specifically have to turn on to experience, it’s kind of like saying pizza is bad because you don’t like pineapple, banana peppers, black olives, and chile flakes.

Not to be antagonistic, but

• chrome fork - much of the browser world is this
• crypto shit - opt in not mandatory
• leaky VPN - opt in not mandatory
• bad search - opt in not mandatory
• ad engine - opt in not mandatory

So, basically, it’s a chrome fork, and some people prefer chrome based browsers, so it’s purely preference?