• tidderuuf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Coming from a multigenerational family of LE and Military I can tell you first hand that NDs are never common. Not even slightly.

      • SynAcker@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Depends who you talk to. I know a guy in construction who has had to patch bullet holes in several LEO houses. Also at the sport men’s club I’m a member of, the only shooting injury we’ve had was from a state trooper during a training excercise. You’re point is valid, though. NDs are supposed to be minimalized through training and adherence to the 4 gun rules. These guys are morons.

          • Sequentialsilence@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago
            1. Keep your finger off the boom trigger until your ready to fire.
            2. know your target and what’s behind it.
            3. assume the gun is always loaded, even when you know it isn’t.
            4. never point it at something you aren’t willing to completely and utterly destroy.
    • Urist@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      There’s no such thing as an accidental discharge. There are negligent discharges and there are mechanical disasters. If it’s not one of those then you intended for the gun to fire.

      • Machinist@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Read about this years ago. This is the only accidental discharge I’ve heard about. Worn leather holster pulls the trigger. In fairness, an argument can be made that using a worn/flexible holster was negligence.

        • Urist@leminal.space
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          In fairness, an argument can be made that using a worn/flexible holster was negligence

          That is the correct argument. This isn’t an accident, this is pure negligence.

      • rumba@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I’ll agree that negligence does not equate to accident, my young child and I have been working on that lesson for years. But intent is a bit of a stretch. If it was actual intent, I’d be overjoyed. This is more of a dumpster fire just doing what it does.

        • Urist@leminal.space
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          You misunderstood what I’m saying. I’m saying this was a negligent discharge. It wasn’t an accidental discharge since those don’t exist. And it wasn’t an intended discharge. And it wasn’t a mechanical failure by the manufacturer or designer of the gun. The only other option is negligent discharge.