Trump’s renewed criticism of the Chagos deal is reportedly because he is being blocked from using UK bases for a strike on Iran.

Donald Trump has withdrawn his backing for Sir Keir Starmer’s Chagos Islands deal because he has not received UK approval to use its military bases for a US strike on Iran, it has been reported.

The US president attacked the agreement to hand sovereignty of the islands to Mauritius and lease back the Diego Garcia joint UK-US military base as “a big mistake”.

His latest U-turn on his previous support for the deal is because of the UK Government’s refusal to give the White House the green light to use the Diego Garcia base or RAF Fairford in Gloucestershire for a potential military campaign against Iran, according to the Times.

  • robocall@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Maybe the Diego Garcia thing will be enough of an excuse to not go to war with Iran on Israel’s behalf?

    • hector@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      There is nothing that would prevent our lawmakers from doing what Israel tells it to, blackmail of them fucking children and whatever else, it finally explains a lot, and Israel isn’t really hiding it anymore, they are reveling in taking the mask off.

      As soon as they start the forever war, Israel will find endless excuses to go back in, bomb this, assassinate that. Weapons programs, terrorists, whatever excuses they come up with. This will never end, and that’s the idea, Israel’s governmental leaders want to forestall elections and a reckoning as they’ve decided that the politicians that failed should stay in power to deal with the fall out from that failure despite not admitting fault and blaming others.

      The rest of their governmet, appointed by their politicians, supremely corrupt and unilateral for 25 years when the semblance of a left collapsed, either believes those politicians or pretends to because they think they will benefit. They revel in their absolute military advantage, able to bomb any of their neighbors with near impunity, as they are unable to well respond if at all, and backed by the US that they’ve compromised so thoroughly they are almost openly showing off being the ones calling the shots ordering the US around. The UK is owned by Israel too, make no mistake, they just have to kowtow to their citizens more in their anti war sentiment more, for now.

    • hector@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Just cynical calculations, he doesn’t have the support to declare war and it would be political suicide for him if he did. Israel owns him, he made his name in purging the party of people opposed to Israel’s abuses, during Corbyn when they purged the party of him and all of his supporters mostly under bogus bigotry charges, accusing and removing more jewish people of anti jewish bias than others per capita.

  • fox2263@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    1 day ago

    There’s no coalition this time. You’re on your own murca (well you’ve got your boyfriend Israel but they’re a bit tied up massacring children at the moment)

  • Not_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 day ago

    Trump:

    Should Iran decide not to make a Deal, it may be necessary for the United States to use Diego Garcia, and the Airfield located in Fairford, in order to eradicate a potential attack by a highly unstable and dangerous Regime

    Can someone please do that to us.

    • Dragomus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Ah yes, potential attack! It’s like a repackaging of the WMD argument…
      Not that I doubt Iran’s crazed potential in the least, but currently the only potential attack comes from the US to cover up domestic sewage…
      What will be the first target, “one way or another”-Greenland or Iran?

  • MrSulu@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 day ago

    What could possibly go wrong? The short victorious “war” rallies citizens, especially those who the nationalistic (MAGA / NRA). It diverts from domestic issues like employment, the economy, ICE raids etc. It allows low scrutiny and speedy legislation changes. All at the low low cost of lives and future threats of retaliation.

    • supamanc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      And remember how we treated the Afghani’s who helped the coalition during that war? Yeah, there will be absolutely no local support this time round.

      • plyth@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        there will be absolutely no local support

        You sure? Iran itself was eager to work with the US when Obama lifted sanctions. It’s just business. People know and don’t take it personal. After Syria, people in Iran know that they won’t get democracy. And yet they are doing some revolting.

        • supamanc@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 hour ago

          Yeah. The US and UK abandoned those natives who supported them on the ground in Afghanistan, left them to fend fo themselves after the Taliban took control. Seeing that, why would and Iranians put themselves in the firing line to support the US?

            • supamanc@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              53 minutes ago

              There is a difference between a (somewhat) (maybe) spontaneous protest the the wider community is involved in, and treason. Supporting a foreign power in an invasion is going to get you and your entire extended friends and family group executed after a stay being tortured in a dungeon.

              • plyth@feddit.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                26 minutes ago

                Addressing an estimated 250,000 people in Munich, Reza Pahlavi - who has called for the overthrow of Iran’s Islamic regime - denounced a crackdown on recent protests there

                https://feddit.org/post/25854413

                Some people want the Shah back.

      • phaseshift@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        10 hours ago

        A petty note, but an important one… afghani is the currency not the people. They don’t like being called that.

        Source: spent a year there with some friends

  • tomiant@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    TFW the Brits are like, nah, we don’t want to help you overthrow the shah of Iran.

    • Dragomus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Trump insulted all EU military fairly recently so that’s probably a double nah from the former allies…
      But hey he has his board of peace now, with all the …oppressive… countries in it, perhaps they’ll send highly trained soldiers to die in Iran.
      Somehow I think not.

    • REDACTED@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      This whole thing can go haywire (including many civilian deaths), especially under Trump. It makes sense for UK to tell them to leave UK out of it. Besides, while going after Iran’s regime is somewhat popular opinion - US doing it on the other hand suddenly makes it sound much more controversial.

      • tomiant@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        I’m with you, on all counts. And I think not wanting to touch USA’s shit is a legitimate take right about now. Shit, it was the wrong take to back in 2001/2003, and it was the wrong take back in *checks notes* most of US history, but right now for sure. We got our own problems now anyway, many of which were directly caused by the USA, so…