You can take “justifiable” to mean whatever you feel it means in this context. e.g. Morally, artistically, environmentally, etc.

    • bright_side_@piefed.worldEnglish
      18·
      5 days ago

      Some good and valid input to the discussion.

      I’d be interested in E) “the actual evidence”. Got a link?

      • auraithx@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
        244·
        5 days ago

        Yes as I had this discussion with someone the other week.

        The effect of ChatGPT on students’ learning performance, learning perception, and higher-order thinking: insights from a meta-analysis

        A peer-reviewed meta-analysis of 51 studies found that ChatGPT has a large positive effect on students’ learning performance, and moderate positive effects on learning perception and higher-order thinking skills (like analysis and synthesis) across educational contexts.

        The Impact of Artificial Intelligence (AI) on Students’ Academic Development

        Research published in the journal Education Sciences reports that AI in educational contexts can lead to personalized learning, improved academic outcomes, and increased engagement, with many students reporting enhanced learning efficiency.

        Artificial intelligence in education: A systematic literature review

        Ai tools support problem-solving skills, collaboration, and instructional quality in meaningful ways.

        • Zos_Kia@jlai.lu
          13·
          5 days ago

          This seems about right. Anecdotally I never learned as much as I do since I use AI. It’s crazy good at explaining stuff with exactly the angle you require according to your level and learning style.

          I’ve done some hardware hacking, built my own Linux distro for a project, got way better at administering my home server.

          The most fun I’ve had is to try and locate the rights to an obscure science fiction short story for a podcast I want to make. This led me to contact a few editors, library archivists, and a couple of noted literature professors. Genuine fun and connections, with the AI helping me navigate mountains of information, the legal aspects and also the cultural differences between the US and UK publishing scenes.

          All of this is just in the last few months, it would have taken me years pre-ai or more realistically I would have given up before getting anywhere.

    • MissGoldenSocks@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      155·
      5 days ago

      Thanks for posting this. I’m really frustrated with how vulnerable people on Lemmy are to propaganda. The amount of upvotes on the post you responded to are just embarrassing. The post is exactly the same kind of bullshit cherry picking I see anti-trans people do.

      • Zos_Kia@jlai.lu
        132·
        5 days ago

        Yes, post-truth slop always has this bitter aftertaste. Big ass bullet list with talking points and links, and you know the pusher has been groomed with counter objections etc… exact same methodology as the alt right pipeline.

    • tatterdemalion@programming.dev
      1·
      4 days ago

      Why deleted? This was a good rebuttal.

      EDIT: I don’t think the comment really violated rule 1, but there was apparently a followup comment that definitely did, and this one just got removed by association. Here’s a very slightly paraphrased version of it that should not break the rules:

      Gish gallop of [explitive].

      A) overblown, and that argues for cleaner power, better cooling, and more efficient models

      B) regulation failure

      C) incorrect, they have made discoveries that humans have been unable to. All human knowledge is built off previous knowledge.

      D) the enemy is both weak and strong. If they don’t produce anything good then the people who are losing their jobs can’t have either, right?

      E) small study based on one task which people are misrepresenting. The actual evidence shows it makes people smarter as they shift priorities.

      F) only for vulnerable people. Better safeguards are needed for the weak minded.

      G) argument against using people’s likeness not ai

      H) use an open source Chinese model

      I) market distortion problem, not a principled reason no one should use the technology any more than GPU shortages made all graphics work illegitimate.

      J) see (H)

      K) try one argument next time. Your best one, [some snarky sarcasm]