https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cqxq38028djo

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/China–South_Korea_relations#%3A~%3Atext=on+the+band.-%2CControversies+over+names+and+history%2Cbe+a+Chinese+tributary+state.

https://amp.dw.com/en/is-china-exploiting-south-koreas-political-crisis/a-71292223

Imagine China stopping it’s imperialist claims after Taiwan, lmao

When China collapses

I have a bridge to sell you if you think Taiwan isn’t real.

Imagine supporting Chinese imperialism purely because it’s not western. Could never be me lol

Dude called me a 12 year old in another thread. RiverRock is evidentially a dipshit projectionist lol

That seems to be the MO of you and this thread.

E.g -“Korea”- and the disregard of South Korean self-determination

Imagine wanting to be told what to do lmao.

-Fails to “gotcha”

-Doesn’t engage in reunification discussion

-Accuses someone else of being 12

I guess I can’t expect much from a River Rock.

… What does this mean?

Is this comment about Yoon Suk Yeol?

This reeks of authoritarian dipshittery, but I’ll still ask about your reunification plans

What does this mean?

Sounds like you just realized that time is relative. Congrats.

The irony of talking about conscription vans and Russian state credibility is very funny.

Point is, this news site is unreliable in the same way Fox News is unreliable. Take it as an unreliable data point and move on with the analysis.

Capability and practice are very different words.

A broke clock can be right twice a day, but it won’t reliably tell you the time.

Knowing that the clock is broken lets you determine that you’ll need at least one more reference to tell time.

If you actually looked at the RSF.org index, you’ll notice how off the colors are on the light greens lmao. Weak meme.

I wasn’t aware of this site, so I looked it up.

Everyone should know it’s a source originating from a country with a press freedom index of 172 out of 180

https://rsf.org/en/index

Suffice it to say, it’s pure Russian government propaganda. The value is knowing what they dislike.

“In defiance of the imposed sanctions, the Russian propaganda outlets RT and Sputnik persistently disseminate disinformation within the European Union by utilising mirrored resources on platforms that have been blocked.

Research group Reset reports that one of them is the portal Swentr, which was registered three days after the announcement of sanctions against RT and uses at least 19 websites to reach an EU audience. Sputnik also operates through mirror sites such as sputnikglobe.com.”

https://www.pravda.com.ua/eng/news/2023/11/24/7430167/index.amp

If anyone was curious about wtf swentr.site was.

This comment contexualizes Meta‘s propaganda about AI, which the article doesn’t do. Mentioning Meta‘s AI blitz along with the secretive nature of this would have strengthened the article IMO.

Appreciated.

The article clearly says very little, except this:

But what Meta did with all this data is unclear.

No shit Zuck doesn’t deserve the benefit of the doubt. The point is this article says very little and reads like a Fox News quality fear piece. Futurism is better than that.

This seems like it’s Meta testing the boundaries of contemporary chatbots so they can refine their stuff so they don’t continually get sued. Given the absurdness of modernity, where people are using these bots in-lieu of other social interactions, this seems like a worthwhile stress test. Assuming they share the findings and don’t sell them which is likely asking too much of a corp.

This article, and especially the headline, seems like it’s fearmongering without substance. It’s like the headlines from anti-science tabloids describing an research article in the most biased terms possible. Thus, this article leaves a bad taste in my mouth.

Am I missing something?

Edit: related article(https://www.engadget.com/2209332/meta-is-facing-1-4-trillion-in-state-lawsuits-over-social-media-addiction/)

Another reason to discredit Southern Baptists