who@feddit.org to News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 days agoFlock ‘Objects to Our Removing Their Equipment’: Emails Reveal Why a Town Put Bags Over Its Flock Cameraswww.404media.coexternal-linkmessage-square20linkfedilinkarrow-up1177arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up1177arrow-down1external-linkFlock ‘Objects to Our Removing Their Equipment’: Emails Reveal Why a Town Put Bags Over Its Flock Cameraswww.404media.cowho@feddit.org to News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 days agomessage-square20linkfedilinkfile-text
https://web.archive.org/web/20260722142213/https://www.404media.co/flock-objects-to-our-removing-their-equipment-emails-reveal-why-a-town-put-bags-over-its-flock-cameras/
minus-squareJasonDJ@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkarrow-up16·3 days agoThe resolution is likely limited by the wavelength of the signal. A 5GHz radio has about a 55mm wavelength. At the top of the 6E/7 spectrum that shoots down to about 42mm. Broadcast Radio (87-108MHz) has a wavelength of 2.7m. I don’t see how a lower frequency signal could be of significant use for modeling 3d objects.
minus-squareSnot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7arrow-down1·3 days agoWell okay mister science man you got me. Thanks for the explainer, for real though. That does make sense.
The resolution is likely limited by the wavelength of the signal.
A 5GHz radio has about a 55mm wavelength. At the top of the 6E/7 spectrum that shoots down to about 42mm.
Broadcast Radio (87-108MHz) has a wavelength of 2.7m.
I don’t see how a lower frequency signal could be of significant use for modeling 3d objects.
Well okay mister science man you got me. Thanks for the explainer, for real though. That does make sense.