The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) wants to make it effectively impossible for people to buy what many call burner phones—a phone not explicitly linked to your identity at the point of purchase—which would impact privacy-conscious people, to domestic abuse survivors, to journalists, and many more. The FCC plans to do this by legally forcing the country’s telecoms to store a wealth of personal information about essentially all phone customers, including a government issued identification number and their physical address, alarming privacy advocates and civil rights activists who compare the measures to those from authoritarian countries where it can be difficult to buy a mobile phone plan without giving up your identity.

The proposed change would drastically shake up how people obtain phone plans in the U.S., and have all sorts of privacy and cybersecurity knock-on effects. The FCC is proposing the data collection partly as a way to combat scammers, with telecoms being required to collect other information on business and foreign customers like the intended use case of their bulk phone plan purchase and their IP address. But the changes would mean telecoms collect data on all new and renewing customers, and the FCC provides a long list of other things that the collected data could help authorities with.

“For decades, civil libertarians have looked overseas at authoritarian countries where the government requires people to register to get a mobile phone to ensure they can be tracked. We never thought that would happen here,” Jay Stanley, senior policy analyst at the American Civil Liberties Union’s (ACLU) Speech, Privacy, and Technology Project told 404 Media in an email. “But make no mistake: with this rulemaking, the government is contemplating taking away people’s ability to get a burner phone, which will hurt low-income people, domestic violence victims, and anyone else who cares about their privacy.”

  • HubertManne@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 days ago

    tracfone you just buy the phone and cards and you apply the cards to the phone number. never have to put any personal information.

    • Maeve@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Where is this? Because Tracphone is Verizon, now, and even under Carlos Slim, required name and address in the USA.

      • lyrial@anarchist.nexus
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Walmart under the brand name Straight Talk. I believe they are owned by (or at least get their phones from) Tracphone.

        • Maeve@kbin.earth
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          It’s all Verizon, now. Iirc, Mint is T-Mobile, Sprint is T-Mobile…we have no not-evil options.

          ETA: and it was hella evil under Slim.

          • lyrial@anarchist.nexus
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            They may own it, buy I don’t know how it would shaje out. I use straight talk, because sometimes things get bad and I can pay $10 for a week of service, which is better than nothing in a pinch. This would risk their customer base leaving since a large part of the appeal is being no contract, but if the FCC is going to force them to stop the ability to pay in cash, I may go back to VOIP only.