ccunning@lemmy.world to Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world · 2 days agoProfessional software engineers of Lemmy, are code reviews still a thing in the age of "AI" assisted coding?message-squaremessage-square54linkfedilinkarrow-up189arrow-down13
arrow-up186arrow-down1message-squareProfessional software engineers of Lemmy, are code reviews still a thing in the age of "AI" assisted coding?ccunning@lemmy.world to Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world · 2 days agomessage-square54linkfedilink
minus-squareslevinkelevra@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up2·19 hours agoIMO this is a bad example as in theory, testers test code against requirements, and if there is no such req stating anything about saturation then how should the testers or in this case the LLM know?
minus-squareCameronDev@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·18 hours agoIt is over simplified, but there are often implicit requirements that a human would be aware of from the broader context that the LLM may not be. i.e add is used to increment a health bar, so wrap around doesn’t make sense.
IMO this is a bad example as in theory, testers test code against requirements, and if there is no such req stating anything about saturation then how should the testers or in this case the LLM know?
It is over simplified, but there are often implicit requirements that a human would be aware of from the broader context that the LLM may not be.
i.e
addis used to increment a health bar, so wrap around doesn’t make sense.