• Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Find me the real world use cases of it replacing people for cheaper. You can’t, they don’t exist right now, it’s all cover for layoffs to happen while keeping stonk price high.

    • curiousaur@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      Receptionists and call centers. Really, I have first hand experience.

      The ai is infinitely patient, can handle infinite calls at once. The caller experience is often higher because they don’t have to wait on hold or get a call back, it’s getting better at solving harder problems.

      • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        21 hours ago

        This is probably a good thing as these tend to be shit jobs with high turnover. Dealing with angry people for hours on end isn’t great for anyone long term.

      • Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        AI as customer service is shit. I wasted an entire day waiting for an electrician to show up while the clanker I was texting to kept reassuring me the techs were on the way. They were supposed to arrive at 4 and by the time I gave up on the company it was 10. It turned out it never even alerted the techs to show up at my property. Humans are way better even if you have to wait for them to call back, they can be held accountable at least.

            • curiousaur@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              16 hours ago

              I’m not going to deanonymise myself, or show call logs that would reveal PII like phone numbers or names. So I get the feeling there’s nothing I’d be willing to show you that you’d be satisfied with, unless you really do just want to see anonymised call logs, but that would be just as easy to spoof as to actually print.

              • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                15 hours ago

                I am not trying to get into an internet feud about whether you’re right or not, I legitimately am interested in seeing proof that AI is replacing human workers, while providing the same or better product for cheaper.

                I have heard a thousand supposed stories, but when you get into the data it all ends up being marketing ploys that vanish like a mirage on any kind of research.

                I don’t care if it’s your call center thing or something else. I have been looking for this and asking in different places for examples and haven’t found any. It’s not even just my AI skepticism that’s pushing my curiousty, I would love to know what to actually invest in if any of this did work.

      • HarneyToker@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        I have yet to use AI to solve any actual problems faster than I could have solved them myself because I am constantly to having to go back and check every aspect of its work.

  • bitteroldcoot@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    3 days ago

    “This category was down by 0.2% from May of 2024 to May of 2025, a tiny drop, but one made more notable by employment in general trending up 0.8% in the same time period.”

    So it just dropped enough for the people deploying ai to realize it sucks and people are cheaper and better. Jeez media really likes to write the headline that keep the advertisers happy.

    • jacksilver@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Actually most job growth has been in Healthcare, a field that is very resistant to AI right now. So if you remove that I think the trend is even less significant (and probably not anything that holds up to much scrutiny).

        • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          21 hours ago

          Worker owned means the employees are the shareholders. Might not do layoffs but still plenty of reason to chase excessive profit in other ways.

          Co-ops might work. Consumers as the owners.

          • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            15 hours ago

            You’re forgetting that people don’t like disruption in their lives. Seeking short term profits ends up causing disruptions, so employee-owned companies are disincentivised to seek short-term gains, though it’s still technically possible.

            Another thing to note is that most employee-owned companies have a disbursement periods where it takes years for an employee to have a full stake in the company.

            Having a mix of beneficial strategies would be best imo. Co-ops are better for servicing a single community, while employee-owned can scale up better.

  • MalReynolds@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Interesting to speculate how many of these are “Bullshit Jobs”, which arguably are the only ones AI is capable of replacing. While this may suck in the short term (especially for USians and others without a decent social security net), in the long run it may lead to more fulfilling work.

    • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Two studies found that while Graeber claimed that an increasing number (from 20-60%) of all jobs are useless, less than 8% of European workers reported feeling that their job is useless, and those numbers are declining rather than growing. Additionally, European essential workers like garbage collectors or janitors more often felt like their jobs were useless than people in jobs classified by Graeber as useless. The studies concluded that Graeber’s theories are insufficient to explain why workers feel their jobs are not socially useful and that toxic work culture and bad management were better explanations for those feelings.

  • TrackinDaKraken@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    3 days ago

    This category was down by 0.2% from May of 2024 to May of 2025, a tiny drop, but one made more notable by employment in general trending up 0.8% in the same time period.

    Correlation much?

    Comparing a trend in a category expected to be affected by AI, to general employment doesn’t mean the drop is because of the expected reason. Could be those businesses are suffering job losses for other, more mundane reasons.

  • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Hopefully the AI bubble will slowly lose air instead of popping all at once and we won’t have a devastating crash.

    Maybe?

    • zqwzzle@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      3 days ago

      As a generation that has experienced several once in a lifetime events. Lol. Lmao even.

      • otp@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        3 days ago
        1. Mass layoffs due to AI.
        2. Economy crashes due to AI bubble burst.
        3. Businesses collapse because AI can’t replace the people that got replaced, especially in the long term
        4. Economy sucks so there’s no money to hire the people who lost their jobs
        5. War and climate change get worse and affect the nouveaux poore more than ever before
        6. A huge volcanic eruption or meteor hit causes local deaths somewhere and worldwide catastrophe
        7. Half-Life 3 releases, but nobody has money or hardware to play it
        8. Aliens invade
        9. Economy goes wild with some stupid new tech.