In my opinion, AI Slop is content made with AI that is low effort. People feel and know the quality of something, and if it feels like slop, it feels like slop.

AI being used is not a deal breaker for me as long as the product is good. AI isn’t magic and it takes skills and knowledge to use it and to judge what the model outputs.

You may see it differently however, some might believe that the use of any AI tools whatsoever turns any app into slop the moment the first commit with AI code in it is made.

What do you think, what does AI Slop mean to you?

    • funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      plagiarism implies a benefit to the plunderer, though. It’s perfectly legal to take images from the internet for your own use - e.g. a sonic the hedgehog themed birthday party for a kid.

      • Rothe@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        It is the AI companies who used the images for training in the first place who are the plagiarisers. People using the AI are just using a plagiarising tool made by plagiarisers. Whether they are fine with that is entirely up to their own conscience.

          • lime!@feddit.nu
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            i also think that. and i love having that discussion with people. like, remember the google robot that drew dogs on every picture you fed it? deepdream, i think it was called? was that evil? because it’s the same tech, just trained on… dogs.

          • That’s okay, you can disagree if you like. It’s not like you’re responsible for the creation, upkeep, and various abuses resulting from, this modern pseudo-AI stupidity. You’re just a useful idiot to them.

            • lime!@feddit.nu
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              i don’t think you should start calling third parties useful idiots, i’m the one who started this.

                • lime!@feddit.nu
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  surely a useful idiot is one who furthers the message and aids in its spreading?

                  • Correct. If you “mildly disagree” that using the mass-plagiarism-powered so-called “AI” is plagiarism from the getgo, you’re being an idiot and advancing the techbro oligarch agenda. I will not respect it. I will not have an overtly polite conversation about it. They are fucking destroying the environment and our living spaces with this shit. Stop using it. Stop defending it. If you disagree, I don’t want to hear from you. There’s nothing to discuss.

    • lime!@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      well yeah, sure. not denying that. but i don’t do it for people to see it. i think of it a bit like cutting stuff out of magazines and gluing it together. it’s remix culture.

      i’m not a creator in any way, i’m a consumer. i just like blending things together.