Microsoft dangles $1 million prizes and Mercedes-AMG cars inside Edge as persistent pop-ups potentially spark fresh “bribery” backlash.

  • BlackLaZoR@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I can use Edge. I offer cloud based edge user experience for $14.99 monthly. Microslop is free to reach out to me any time so we can hammer out an agreement. Smugface.jpg

  • reksas@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    8 hours ago

    “our browser is so good, we have to offer bogus prizes to get people to switch to it!”

  • Katana314@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    23 hours ago

    One of the last things I used to respect about Microsoft was when they kept up the development of their own rendering engine, even as Chrome ran away with its popularity. IE6 was a monster, but for a time MS was doing a good job as an underdog by pushing standards compliance. Even if it wasn’t as nice as Firefox, it was important to have more horses in the game of competing browsers rather than creating a monoculture around Chrome.

    Needless to say, the Edge appearing in this contest is nothing like what I ever had hope for.

  • cybernihongo@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    I used to use Edge at home, then ditched it. I used it recently at work and it is getting really enshittified. Now I’m between Cromite which works until suddenly the interface freezes, or Ungoogled Chromium which I haven’t got to work on the work laptop (it works now on my home Linux so whatever).

    Edge used to be so much better before today.

      • Kjell@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        23 hours ago

        Or Librewolf, which is a fork from Firefox and removes the telemetry that Firefox collects.

        • Lumisal@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          19 hours ago

          That’s too extreme for most people. A lot of people do want certain services to remember they logged in for example. Waterfox is typically the better recommendation - or, was. I’m less trusting of them after they chose to use Brave Browser code for an AdBlocker

    • rmuk@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Edge before it adopted Chromium was an excellent browser - fast, standards compliant, rock solid. Adopting Chromium is basically them doing the absolute minimum to ship a browser at all without showing someone else’s logo. We use Edge at work - Chrome and Firefox are also supported - and it shocking how many MDM policies we have to have to make Edge usable.

  • gokayburuc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 day ago

    This disease is simply testing AI systems on your browsing data. It’s trying to collect data from your services and analyze it with AI. That’s all. If something is offering you big rewards, free services, or discounts, it’s probably using you as material for its services.

  • lb_o@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 day ago

    Native persistent pop-up that doesn’t go away and stays on multiple tabs is truly the best way to advertisme your browser /s

  • floofloof@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    182
    ·
    2 days ago

    They’re just making themselves look trashy and desperate.

    What might work is making their software better than everyone else’s. But that requires effort and skill and managerial competence.

  • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Hey Microsoft, how about innovating instead? Edge is a Chrome engine browser like dozens of others out there. Why not write a new browser engine to give customers a choice? Or at worst, how about contract with Apple to license Webkit bringing a third solid choice for a browser engine to Windows. You’re not going to out-Chrome Google Chrome browser, so stop trying.

    • Uairhahs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      I’m gonna go out on a limb and play the devil’s advocate. Edge actually makes a lot of optimisations and improvements that are merged into upstream chrome. While Microsoft is the shady corp that is forcing the ai garbage and data collection, the Devs are actually very competent.

      Edge has one huge benefit which causes me to use it across Windows, Linux and even android and that is extension support on all even mobile. No other chrome based android browser has mobile extensions and a competent or seamless sync both figured out. I like being able to check something on my phone and seamlessly pick it up on any other device.

      I like Vivaldi’s workflow but they have yet to add mobile extensions.

      • Katana314@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        23 hours ago

        Right now, Chrome is basically IE6. It rushes in standards with little compliance, bloats your memory, and everyone is forced to use it. All browsers are just skins, and if Google’s recent Android moves are any indication, they’ll likely close off source at some point so they can load it through with spyware.

        In terms of making a bad situation slightly better, I’d be in favor of MS re-vamping their browser division. It has little to do with AI or murdering Palestinians though, so I doubt they will.

        • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          As a web developer, I would happily support current chrome over literally any version of IE. It’s not even a contest.

          The majority of standards are properly implemented in chrome, and it tends to be edge cases that are not. Whereas for IR you needed IE specific “hacks” to do a number of everyday things.

          • Katana314@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            Of course they’re implemented properly in Chrome. They wrote those standards, and pushed them through without review. Hence why technologies like WebRTC and simple gradients had about 8 half-working implementations in Chrome, while the later IE team put a hand up and said “Hang on, let’s implement this the right way and agree on a spec.”

            The way you describe IE-specific hacks was true up through around IE9. Once they got to Edge, they retired importance of major versions and insisted people auto-update their browser, getting companies off the idea of retaining an old browser for “compatibility”.

            They were doing the right thing for a short time before the end. I suppose a lot of people didn’t even see that period.

        • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 days ago

          Did you use IE when it was still around? Edge is their “new” offering, because of how terrible their own engine was. Moving back to their own engine would be a step backwards.

    • Hanrahan@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      Edge is a Chrome engine browser like dozens of others out there. Why not write a new browser engine to give customers a choice?

      they tried that with Edge 1.0

      • GenosseFlosse@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Writing your own rendering engine that works exactly like chrome, has the same features and preferably no exploits is not something you or even a big company can whack out in a week or so. You need to support js, css, html, hardware acceleration, https, certificate checks, support notifications, location, camera and mic, video play and a whole lot of other features you take for granted. A modern browser is light years away from the first browsers that came out around 2000.

      • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        Thats the description of both Vivaldi and Brave browsers, which also haven’t out-Chromed Chrome. Both are Chrome engine with built in ad blockers.

        • Psythik@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Exactly, the average person using installing browser add-ons. They want a lightweight, simple browser from a familiar brand that just works. Adblocking alone isn’t enough to convince Average Joe to switch, when they don’t even know that adblockers exist.

    • baatliwala@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      Bro yapping about something he knows fuck all about. MS has contributed a ton to upstream Chromium, from page rendering improvements to improved efficiency for battery consumption.

    • kungfuratte@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 days ago

      Should you ever feel the urge to do something wild and stupid: yes, actually Microsoft offers an official Linux version of Edge.

    • Saprophyte@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      I have edge installed on my steam deck, I used it to play bf6 on game pass before they jacked up the price last year.

    • Wispy2891@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yes but they do zero tests on the build, if it compiles, it ships. For example it crashes if you try to open a file dialog and the copilot button is not working and can’t be hidden

  • new_guy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    2 days ago

    We started to use ad blockers in the early 2000s because no one could trust they were the 999,999 visitor to the website.

    It sounded (and stills sounds) scammy.

    • RedRibbonArmy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      It started with pop-up blockers.

      Opera was the first major browser to incorporate tools to block pop-up ads; the Mozilla browser later improved on this by blocking only pop-ups generated as the page loads.[citation needed] In the early 2000s, all major web browsers except Internet Explorer let users block unwanted pop-ups almost completely. In 2004, Microsoft released Windows XP SP2, which added pop-up blocking to Internet Explorer. -Wikipedia

  • crandlecan@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    2 days ago

    Let me guess… Existing users are excluded from participating? Cause I ain’t got no pop up banner anywhere. Or is cause I’m European?

  • Veedem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    2 days ago

    Microsoft is a very large lumbering giant that seems to lack a cohesive vision forward, especially on the consumer front. Every single piece of consumer facing software lacks a cohesive design language, and seems to be regressing in usability. No one is truly primed to replace them yet in either the corporate or consumer businesses however, something like the MacBook Neo can certainly take a few points of market share away from the standard consumer

    • frongt@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      This is what happens when they get MBAs in charge. Same thing happened at Apple. The original guy with a vision in charge (Gates, Jobs) goes away and the company suffers for it.

        • 4am@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 days ago

          At the time of Gates, they wanted to monopolize the operating system market because that was the way to lock people in. People owned hardware and in order to make the most money your needs your OS to be their platform so they had no choice but to pay you.

          Now in 2026 everyone’s OS is Chrome. So the goal is to make everyone depend on your cloud storage, on your productivity suite, on your chatbot, your automation platform, your cloud database. Then you give them just a state and then rent it to them in perpetuity.

          This is why they don’t mind making RAM too expensive. Drives people to inexpensive devices and subscriptions for services for the hardware they can no longer afford and don’t have the skills to maintain.

        • frongt@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Steal the best parts of every other system, make Windows easy to develop for, and corner the business market.