• 404found@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 hours ago

    What Google is accomplishing with this change is tighter control of their results.

    This is disappointing and only serves the interest of Google.

    • BenchpressMuyDebil@szmer.info
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      You can hide the AI preview using udm14.com or adding &udm=14 query param to your google queries (can be done automatically by adding browser search engine with this param)

    • cley_faye@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      You can use the web page, aka udm14. You can also set this in your browser so that typing in the search/address bar directly opens this.

      I have no idea if this particular development affects these results, but so far it’s been nice. No AI summary, no “similar” advertisement, no “questions about…”. Just plain results. Like, I don’t know, that old google website.

  • Bieren@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Before long they will use it to just create their own sites. Their own articles. Why replace just the headline. A whole internet of just google ai generated bs. Just search something on Google and everything from there on is ai generated. All results. All pictures. The maps. Everything. Nothing will be real.

  • sinematic@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Absolute pricks. “Don’t do evil” they said.

    AI has biases. News are titled to be biased too. This is grounds for fake news.

    • Jiral@lemmy.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Don’t do evil

      Hasn’t that been Google’s guiding principle for quite some time already?

      • ripcord@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        “Don’t be evil” hasn’t been an official guiding principle for over a decade, no.

          • ripcord@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Ah, I was waking up and didn’t see the strike through

            Both here and on reddit you can just say “whoosh” although it wouldn’t really have totally made sense

    • sigmabot@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      6 hours ago

      I’d trust an LLM to summarize an article and give it an honest title over a piece of shit journalist that wrote it.

  • NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Wow. Thats horrible. Google has been a shitty search engine for a while now, but this is even worse.

    I quit using them as my main search probably 5 years ago. But I get that most people still use it and most people will be misled.

    Awful.

  • Fit_Series_573@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Apparently this has been going on for a while but The Verge started sounding the alarm 3 months ago. They know most people won’t read more than a couple sentences past a headline if they even open the article at all. Confirmation bias is about to go wild

    • kazerniel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I may switch to them as my primary provider. They seem to source results from Bing, and with the noai prefix hopefully won’t keep turning on AI summary like Ecosia does 😑

  • LogicalDrivel@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    1 day ago

    I tried looking for an instruction PDF for some stage lights the other day. No amount of “google-fu” could find the right thing. Links labeled as one model showed stuff for other models when clicked, and the god awful summary that it shoves in your face was just full of contradictions of itself. Google is warm trash water at this point.

    • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      21 hours ago

      I find the same thing with vehicle years, I look for say a fuse box layout for a 1985 c20 truck and I will get nothing but genaric trash or stuff for 2021 model years. I used to be able to use “year” but even that has stopped working. Like how do you fuck model and year up?

    • mineralfellow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      I still use Google Scholar, but I have recently seen that it is also being enshitified. What’s the next best option?

    • Jiral@lemmy.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      Ecosia seems to be pushing the aI stuff hard as well, but at least you have to press the obnoxious AI buttons to get it. Still, it refuses to make those buttons optional. Duckduckgo let’s you have clean experience without rubbing AI buttons or AI summaries in your face and so does qwant.

      • kazerniel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Still, it refuses to make those buttons optional.

        Not only that, back before I left Ecosia a few months ago, it kept forgetting that I turned off AI summaries. Every week or so it would turn back on… I’ll try DuckDuckGo’s noai prefix this time, that hopefully won’t have this issue. (I really like Ecosia’s mission, but come on…)

        • Jiral@lemmy.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Duckduckgo should not have any such issues. If you need that prefix you should not even need any cookies. Going there has all those no AI settings on by default. Regarding Ecosia, could it be that you deleted some related cookies accidentialy? Or did they really push in a very sleazy way for AI?

          • kazerniel@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            45 minutes ago

            Regarding Ecosia, could it be that you deleted some related cookies accidentialy?

            Not sure, I use uBlock Origin, but the site does remember my other settings, so it feels a bit shady.

      • Lena@gregtech.eu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I like the idea, but 5$/mo for 300 searches isn’t worth it, and 10$/mo isn’t worth it for unlimited searches either, personally.

    • njordomir@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Protip, you can use your hostsfile or your router to block google so you don’t get tempted. If you may have to bypass, you can use some blocking extensions to allow an override after a nag screen chastising yourself for being weak willed. I rarely reach for the goog nowadays because I have a whole workflow I go through before giving in.

    • kazerniel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      Sadly Ecosia is not good for more niche topics or foreign languages. After a few months of use, I went back to Google with &udm=14 😕

      Edit: Though with Google now falsifying site titles I’ll have to look for an alternative… I wonder if they do the same towards the providers that rely on them, like DuckDuckGo?

      • sirimeow@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 hours ago

        I had issues searching stuff in my native language when using duckduckgo as well. Switched to qwant and its been a lot better for me at least, so maybe try that?

      • Truscape@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        DuckDuckGo uses a basket of search indexes excluding google - so even if one of them enshittifies they can reallocate that portion to another source.

    • HuudaHarkiten@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 day ago

      I love Ecosia because I love trees and will keep using them until I can afford kagi or something.

      But one thing that drives me through the wall… If I search something in my native language, because I want results that are in my native language, google/bing (which ecosia uses) decides to translate reddit posts for me and Ecosia slaps them to the top of the results. Its rather annoying.

      • kazerniel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        I have the same experience and it drives me nuts - if I wanted English results, I’d search in English!

        • HuudaHarkiten@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          Its such a weird thing to do. Especially when you click the translated link and it opens a page that is not translated. So if they think they are “helping” people who don’t know the language, how exactly does it help that they translate the title and half a sentence in the search results.

        • SeductiveTortoise@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Yes, but they probably know that none of us speaks English, so it wants to help us because we are idiots.

          Wait, thinking about that…

    • teyrnon@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      Startpage is google through a proxy server, and I noticed an article mislabeled the other day as such from there for a link I posted here.

      • Digitalprimate@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        All true, but it generally shows you search results in a reasonable order and including reliable sources. Like a fine-tuner for Google that doesn’t feed them your data. At least not that we know of…

        • teyrnon@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          Yeah but it has really gone downhill since 2021 especially, to the point of being virtually worthless. The only quick answers offered now on the search page are by design ai, all the results are machine written seo, restating the question in every possible way to hit results, then explaining why someone would want to know the answer to that question in exhaustive detail, then a short paragraph with the answer, that you have to wade through the drivel to find, when it used to put it on the search page results.

          They don’t provide streaming links anymore, defective merchandise only returns links to the companies that make those products on forums they moderate (looking at you best buy everything you sell is now defective, never again,) and articles aren’t provided, even with exact information, date, name of article, name of publication, subject matter. They aren’t even trying and will give you completely unrelated information.

          I wouldn’t be mad if I didn’t know it could work better. When it did initially work, I was surprised at how well it returned information. I know it can work better because it did work better.

          We need free to the user search that is geared to work for us, not for advertisers and others that pay them, or the armies of often automated programs to write articles to his search engines despite being garbage information.

          • Digitalprimate@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            Lovely. Next you’re going to tell me Proton mail went evil. (Thanks for the explanation though! I’ll have a look at Kagi).

            • teyrnon@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              As a matter of fact I have just this morning talked about protonmail being corrupted by the administration. Tuta is where it’s at. Protonmail eats dick. 79-year-old fat (person’s) disgusting diaper dick.