• rozodru@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Bunkers just prove yet again the short term mindset of the wealthy. they’re useless. They hold off death for a brief period of time. Eventually though you need to leave said bunker of which we kill you on exit OR you go the hitler route.

      These idiots honestly believe if they throw themselves in one we’re not just going to camp the outside?

      • Brummbaer@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Bunkers only are useful if there is friendly territory behind them.

        If you can’t call the police or your local warlord it’s a prison in the best case and an expensive tomb in the worst case.

        • frongt@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          15 hours ago

          Or air scrubbers if you recirculate. But those are consumable and need to be replaced once they’re used up.

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Marie Antoinette thought she was safe too.

      They all do.

      If they really didn’t, they’d hand back some of the wealth/power to appease us. Which is why when/if they get to that point, we take what they offer and use that to fight for more.

      • bearboiblake@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        16 hours ago

        You joking? We’re not gonna make deals with them. They can’t be trusted. We are just gonna take all their shit and either kill them or put them in a re-education camp.

        • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          14 hours ago

          Which is why when/if they get to that point, we take what they offer and use that to fight for more.

          If they say:

          We’ll pay some taxes, and everyone can get healthcare.

          As an attempt to appease the masses, I’m saying the sane response is to take their money, get healthcare with it, then immediate go back to demanding more of our shit back from them.

          I almost added this to my first comment, and it looks like I should have left it:

          We need to be like the unhoused population of South Park when pushing for these thing.

          https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1UAF8ISSAdw

          No matter what they agree to give back, accept it, and without blinking or hesitation ask for more.

          Does it make sense now?

          • bearboiblake@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            13 hours ago

            I don’t agree. I think small reforms will rob us of our energy. We need to end this shit, hard and fast, for the benefit of future generations. We need to take bold, decisive action. Small gifts from the ruling class will just make us complacent. We need to take them down hard and ensure they never ever get back up.