

Just read the paper. ArsTechnica is such a terrible source for analysis on anything remotely technical.


Just read the paper. ArsTechnica is such a terrible source for analysis on anything remotely technical.


Thanks for noticing that. I certainly missed the ‘=1’ bit.
Debian testing, then upgrade it as they make major releases. I have yet to have a single Debian upgrade go wrong on Desktop or Server. It is basically magic.


Assuming that:
On the Linux laptop:
sudo sysctl net.ipv4.ip_forward=1 ## updated edit thanks to folks pointing out my typo.
sudo sysctl -p
:POSTROUTING ACCEPT [0:0]
-A POSTROUTING -s 192.168.1.1/24 -o wlan0 -j MASQUERADE
On the mac:


Is it easier to secure, monitor fewer, bigger reactors or thousands of* small ones? Accidents are still going to happen and I know which scenario makes more sense to me. Especially in light of Trump’s recent push to deregulate nuclear energy, kill the EPA, and pretty much any other kind of sensible management efforts of technology that is great until something goes wrong then it quickly becomes a multi-generational clusterfuck.
Solar, batteries and long-range transmission infrastructure just makes too much sense I guess.


This project has never been more relevant in light of the recent acceleration of enshitification over at Microslop. Might be time to donate a few bucks.
We need improved Linux support for power management on ARM platforms. In general Linux on ARM has been good for a long time now. (ex RaspberryPi, Gentoo, Ubuntu)
Where things aren’t so great is the choice in OEMs putting out ARM parts like Broadcom, Qualcomm and Apple. All of whom aren’t exactly open source champions. In a less imperfect world we’d have something like RISC-V with great power management and linux support available in mobile computing SKUs/TDPs.