• 0 Posts
  • 26 Comments
Joined 11 months ago
cake
Cake day: April 10th, 2025

help-circle



  • Well, if you read the lawsuit, NY is seeking:

    1. Well of course, the court to determine Valves lootbox + key paradigm is illegal

    2. Pay a fine to the state

    3. Resitution to all NY residents

    So, even if it did only apply to NY… you would at least be due to have all your key purchases refunded, as welp as the amount that Valve shaves off of every item transaction in the marketplace.

    I am also not so sure that Valve actually makes like, the bulk of their money off of keys and marketplace fees. We don’t know, because those numbers are not public, though more will likely come out as a result of this case doing discovery…

    But based off of the estimates and info that is out there, my guess would be that key+marketplace txn fees is roughly between 5% and 10% of their yearly revenue.

    My guess would be that the vast majority of their money comes from the generally 30% cut they take from 3rd party game sales.

    So… I would think the primary problem with getting a Steam Frame is still the… RAM price crisis caused by AI, and more generally, the fact that we’re doing the Second Great Depression.




  • If you get the key for free, which you can, but is by far not the most common way most keys are acquired, then probably it would not constitute gambling, as the player isn’t putting any money in.

    This… is how it originally worked, I think, for a time, when TF2 first came out.

    You could get keys from either randomly playing the game and finishing or spending time in a round, or via achievements, iirc.

    But yeah, then the keys could also be bought for money, and the whole trading market and steam wallet were introduced, and since then, probably 99% of keys for any game with em are bought, not acquired via in game activity.






  • I get what you are saying and generally agree, but!

    It actually was not always the way it is now.

    Play RDR2.

    Look at the advertisements for things, actually read them.

    They’re actually pretty accurate to the advertisements of the time.

    They are extremely based on ‘facts’, convicing the prospective buyer that the product is the best product, is very useful, can do this, is unique in this way.

    Of course, sometimes the ‘facts’ are lies… but the general idea is not to sell a … emotion, or personality, or element of identity, or sense of belonging.

    Its almost always to convince the buyer that this product is useful to them, and is priced reasonably for what it can do.

    The turning point away from this was mostly or largely due to Edward Bernaise, the nephew of Sigmund Freud.

    More or less, he applied Freud’s ideas and some of his own, some of others, to marketing.

    His first big hit was angling Cigarettes as ‘Torches of Freedom’ to suffragettes.

    At that point in time, smoking tobacco was generally seen as disgusting and low class for women, but not for men.

    So, he was basically the first guy that went around and paid people to smoke cigarettes, while being trendy, with pre-designed slogans.

    … It worked.

    Because he was selling identity, not products, and this is much more effective.

    Prior to that… brands basically were just built on the reputation of their products.

    Now… now its so insane that for many say, video games and movies… far more time of the entire experience of the product is the hype train, the controversy, the twitter wars… prior to the product even coming out.

    And then, its often just a flash in the pan.

    But… you will still have dedicated fans, ongoing internet arguments, for literal years, even decades, since the last time anyone involved actually viewed or played the product.

    Thats all designed for, to maximize the chances of that happening.

    Marketing literally is applied psychology.



  • Problem:

    This is the exact same kind of shit being used to automate prioritize and execute military kill-chains.

    Basically: Finda target, tell others about the target, assess nearby firepower capable of neutralizing the target, determine best course of action.

    … all we have to do is cross that last step over into ‘and then execute that course of action’.

    All the drone warfare in Ukraine?

    EM jamming and literally hacking the things or their CnC systems is an effective counter, in certain situations.

    So, how do you counter that?

    One solution is keep an actual thin wire, like a TOW missile, connecting the operator and the drone. Gotta be a real long wire though.

    Other solution?

    Make the drone fully autonomous once its been locked in to a specific plan.

    Don’t worry though, I’m sure Pete Hegseth will navigate this tightrope about as well as traffic stop line walk test.