Mount it in the VM, not as Proxmox host storage — that keeps a dead NAS from hanging Proxmox itself, and you can reboot or move the one VM without touching the host. FYI, use nofail with automount rather than a plain entry that blocks boot, so the VM still comes up if TrueNAS is offline when it starts.
Give each Docker service its own dataset/share instead of one big share for everything, so one service filling or locking a share doesn’t take the rest down. And keep anything that can’t tolerate a stall — database files especially — on local disk in the VM, with only bulk media/files on the NFS mount. Test it once by taking TrueNAS offline on purpose and watching what the containers do; that’s when you’ll find out if a hang occured rather than a clean error. Seperate shares also make permissions easier to fix per service, since you’re already dealing with the ownership issues tofu mentioned.
The June part is what stuck out to me. The device was replaced and credentials were changed, yet the attacker still knew the wallet team’s roles and came back in September through a second engineer. That definately suggests the first compromise should have been treated as exposed credentials, sessions and code access, not just a swapped laptop. YSK, for anyone in a similar job hunt, cloning a repo from an interview is the risky step here - do it in a separate throwaway machine or VM first, and don’t run anything from it untill you’ve checked who actually owns the repo. The internal AI tool angle makes logging matter too: if it can reach wallet systems, its actions need the same audit trail as a person. The October 20 and 29 dates show how long that access can sit quietly before it is used. Hope that helps.