I’m no licensing expert and I was responding to the previous comment that said someone can fork it and then make it proprietary. So If they already have dominant market position, they could force people to use a proprietary version.
- 0 Posts
- 6 Comments
Is rust-coreutils being developed by Canonical? Then it sounds like shooting themselves in the foot. Why give competitors a chance to take over a vital package that is at the core of their OS?
Being responsible with powerful technology starts with knowing who is using it.
The fuck it does. Claude is already censored - you can’t get a recipe of a poison, schematics for a bomb, an advice on how to hide a body. If you can, then it’s Anthropic engineers didn’t do their job.
Knowing who is using it helps either with conditional censorship, or helping governments to track people based on their prompts, or just plainly lying and using data for analytics and training. All these easons are shit.
And don’t tell me this is to protect the kids again. Let the parents do their job.
pound_heap@lemmy.dbzer0.comto
Privacy@lemmy.ml•AI web searching - which is the least terrible for privacy but retains accuracy?
3·1 month agoLook at maple ai (trymaple.ai). This looks like one of the most privacy oriented projects in the space
pound_heap@lemmy.dbzer0.comto
Privacy@lemmy.ml•Slackware Says No to Age Verification, But Fedora Linux Says Yes
3·1 month agoI would not keep up any hopes on Ubuntu. Canonical will comply with any laws

Google Pixel has a standard “Now Playing” feature that is using on-device recognition. Well, you have to trust Google on that, though.