It’s based on an average for western countries, but of course you can calculate something more specific to your situation with company financial data and taxation rates in your country:

https://lemmy.zip/post/63946061/26366452

I was unsure if I should use this instead, but the baldness is too sexy and I might have to tag it NSFW:

Don’t be a commie! Be content with 40% of the value of your work. They might even give you 41% if you defend your capitalist masters.

TMTG said in December that it is merging with the American company TAE, which is developing nuclear fusion technology.

From crypto scams to nuclear fusion; what can go wrong?

Dunno what you’re trying to prove here, apart from “removing an outlier from the data makes the data closer to the average”, which is pretty obvious.

But you can clearly see that the graph shows Europe, not EU, so using your same calculation with the population of Europe, which is 745 million and excluding France, the result is 1.13.

Also I don’t see any indication that OurWorldInData is using an average of countries (which would be stupid). Considering their jobs are statistics, they probably know how to aggregate per population, aka a weighted average.

I don’t have access to the source data since you need to register, but I would assume that OurWorldInData knows to aggregate Europe per population, and not just average the values per country. France is not the only outlier, there’s also Norway and probably some others I haven’t seen

I see that some people try to attribute this to older population and/or Alzheimer, but even by those metrics the countries above are pretty close and wouldn’t justify such a big gap:

As for the reliability of data, it’s from a peer reviewed study by an American university. If they had a way to make the China data look worse, I’m sure they wouldn’t hesitate.

“But you see, they told me it’s for democracy and freedom!”