halcyoncmdr

Meanwhile commercial shipping in international waters uses the worst fuels on the planet and has basically zero regulation. Emitting thousands of times the pollutants every day, but that’s not flashy and doesn’t involve SpaceX which is guaranteed instant clickbait.

Yeah but the headline! Run over sounds worse than struck.

Support your local Street Pharmacist, not Big Pharma!

Most likely the thought is that without US security support, Taiwanese sentiment will shift towards China by default.

I never said it was solely on them, but saying that has no bearing on it is ridiculous as well.

We also had COVID which many/most schools had no fucking idea how to handle. There’s basically an entire year of wasted education there.

Remote learning is a completely different beast. And digital social interaction is completely different than being physically at school with friends. Social interactions are a large part of learning as well.

Blame it on the technology though, because admitting that Republicans plan are ALWAYS terrible for anyone below the 1%, without exception, somehow is impossible.

I’m sure the systemic defunding and dismantling of the public education system across the United States at the hands of Republican lawmakers over the same timeframe has absolutely nothing to do with it.

How the fuck does age gating prevent cyber bullying? That’s not an age issue, it’s an asshole issue.

Oh wait, because it’s not about age at all but identifying individuals who think differently when the regime. Whichever regime that is.

And an actual search engine… Not an LLM prompt. A plain regular search engine!

Put the error wording in quotes. Scroll past the AI LLM response they force at the top. That first result under there almost certainly gives you the answer.

Ah the classic Linux community response to any complaint.

1. The default either actively ignores what every other software does or purposely uses something other than everything else for no apparent reason.
2. Someone brings up the fact that it makes no sense why it’s different and how it makes the user experience worse.
3. Someone else recommends a half baked solution that still doesn’t really solve the problem and doesn’t address the fact that the specific weirdness being default is the issue. So it ignores the actual complaint and only provides a half solution.
4. Nothing is ever done to address the issue and it remains for decades constantly annoying new users and being one of thousands of small issues that turn potential curious new users away as they accumulate.

Alright, so the radar is detecting a large object in front of the vehicle while travelling at highway speeds. The vision system can see the road is clear.

So with your assumption of listening to whatever says there’s an issue, it slams on the brakes to stop the car. But it’s actually an overpass, or overhead sign that the radar is reflecting back from while the road is clear. Now you have phantom braking.

Now extend that to a sensor or connection failure. The radar or a wiring harness is failing and sporadically reporting back close contacts that don’t exist. More phantom braking, and this time with no obvious cause.

I don’t think it’s necessarily about cost. They were removing sensors both before costs rose and supply became more limited with things like the tariffs.

Too many sensors also causes issues, adding more is not an easy fix. Sensor Fusion is a notoriously difficult part of robotics. It can help with edge cases and verification, but it can also exacerbate issues. Sensors will report different things at some point. Which one gets priority? Is a sensor failing or reporting inaccurate data? How do you determine what is inaccurate if the data is still within normal tolerances?

More on topic though… My question is why is the robotaxi accident rate different from the regular FSD rate? Ostensibly they should be nearly identical.

That doesn’t sound like cheating, that’s more like an open relationship. He knew about it and didn’t care.