…we kill the fucking lot of them?

It doesn’t display on this client on All I don’t think. If I’m looking at the community then yes, but not in the aggregated feed, unless I’m doing it wrong

As long as someone is killed, Hegseth will nut.

It’s made the experience so much better with the free tagging. A little bit of time labeling trolls in bright red makes it pretty clear that only a few are the problem. Then you find out they mod the subreddit they spam to, and ban you for down voting their posts. The trash takes itself out.

Should personally pull the trigger himself if he wants it done like this. What service member will have this weight on them?

So true! Whatever happened to them? Seemed pretty cut and dry.

About the same as “let’s just start fresh!”

Apologies (and more importantly amends) are owed and paid because they are a debt on the debtor. I am not in turn owed a receipt for either. It hurts to not get an acknowledgent, but if I’m upset that I didn’t get one, I have to start this statement over.

Worth noting I am really bad at this. Been actively trying it for exactly ten years as of tomorrow come to think of it…

I have been on both sides, and I believe the only justification needed is in the heart of the individual. Another thing to consider is that narcissists often weaponize apologies to avoid consequences. Theirs become meaningless over time to those “closest” to them.

Just stop doing it.

“Nah, I’ll wait” is a perfectly valid response.

Same account posted complaining about mods not doing anything about spam, and the mod replied and apologized…

Who writes, posts, or reads this garbage

I feel like the only real solution for a lot of these creators is to run their own sites like corridor digital does. The content can go anywhere, but if they rely on the income, that’s gotta come from somewhere

The headline here omits the quotations around ‘antisemitic’ which is quite deliberate.

Without due process, anyone is a “fugitive” so…

The fediverse really needs the knights of new.

Ukraine forfeited sovereignty all the way back in 2014

There it is. Glad we found the position you’re working from.

A RAND report discussing hypothetical ways to pressure Russia is not evidence that the U.S. secretly planned and initiated Russia’s invasion. An opinion article by one strategist in 2021 is not a declaration of NATO policy. Chomsky, Kennan, Matlock, and a 1997 open letter can all argue that NATO expansion was strategically unwise without establishing that Ukraine forfeited its sovereignty or that Putin was compelled to invade.

You’re also confusing “this policy might provoke a reaction” with “the reaction was caused by the policy and is therefore justified.” Those are not the same sentence, no matter how much links you attach to them.

The report was published in 2019, after Russia had already invaded Ukraine in 2014. It discusses escalation risks; it does not say Russia was entitled to invade then, nor in 2022, nor does it transfer responsibility for Putin’s decisions to NATO. Try reading the dates as well as the adjectives.