How can I install a VPN client in a router? A simple soho device, like those tplink, dlink, asus… It doesn’t support openwrt.

If I use VPN, my isp will see that I send and receive gibblish to and from a single address (the vpn server), all over port 443, right?

If I use TOR, what does my ISP see?

My router’s DHCP service is pointing clients to the pihole for DNS. Should I run that on HTTPS too? Can the pi do that?

I think I am not understanding this comment. I’m saying I don’t trust the ISP. Why would I invade my house and phone with more of their gadgets?

What is the other 50%? How is a VPN trustworthy?

My pihole serves dns. If not found, it goes directly to root tables (I forgot how they are called).

The router, I just connected its WAN port to the ISP’s switch/router/AP. Within the LAN under my router I have DHCP sending everybody to do lookups to the pihole. I don’t know what full bridge is.

The ISP’s modem/router/switch/AP, I cannot configure. It is a fucking “smart” brick remotely controlled.

Can it be installed at a network level, rather than at a device level (like pihole)?

An account number is a unique number that is associated to your account. That IS an ID.

You have that number → you can find the person.

That is an ID. Even if you call it banana shake and say “bro, trust me this is not an ID”. It is still an ID: a piece of information in a domain that uniquely maps to elements in a co-domain, being the later, the set of persons in this country with a SSN.

Under your logic, a rifle stops being a rifle if it has a sticker that says “not valid as a rifle”

It is a unique number that is associated to your person in an injective manner in the country (specifically designed to identify your tax documents by the IRS).

Regardless of what is printed in the card, that, BY DEFINITION is an ID.

Being an ID and being proof of citizenship are two orthogonal ideas.

The SSN is the former, but not the latter.

The sentence “an ID to proof your citizenship” is misconstructed.

IDs and Proofs of something are both subclasses of “documents”. The correct phrase would be: “a document to prove citizenship”.

That document could (in principle) not identify you, but at the same time demonstrate that you are a citizen (for example, you could have a long cryptographic self-validated number that hashes to a “Yes”, or “Invalid”). But of course that’s not too practical.

This country is so weird… It is so full of stuff that makes no sense. And the strange part (to me) is how natural this is for its inhabitants.

It is an ID. A crappy one, but ID, by definition!: it was created to identify people

Well… an ID is whatever can be used to identify you. Whether it was or not initially envisioned for that. And the SSN does that, to some extend

I once hard (here) that people in USA is kind of against having an ID document.

It ended up anyway giving them one of the crappiest IDs in any country: SSNs

to answer your questions: it is super cheap (~5 US dollars), fast, has many security systems, it is quickly verifyable agains government databases, it has a photo, your signature, and, if valid, nobody will question it.

It looks like a mini version of the plastic card in mdern pastports (of the size of a credit card)

The police can stop you and without probable cause ask you for your ID (and car/driving documents if in a car), check it against the national database, and give it back to you. You have to show it (required by law) and it is your responsibility (if you are over 18) to keep it with you. The intention is to catch people with pending charges or arrest orders and stuff. If you are not hiding from the law, it is a simple, civilized interaction that would take you 2~5 mins.

You know, the kind of things that you would expect from a 3rd world country, less developed than USA.

I am from a country in which you normally take your ID document with you and cast your vote in person. All the millions of us do it, and the afternoon of that day we have the total count of votes. It is a very straightforward process.

I am not supporting Trump, really, but why would the implementation of this be a negative thing?