… is an indication of tooling, not a scarlet letter that AI contributed to the source code. A dev can include AGENTS.md to support automated maintenance (pre-commit hooks, config scripts, Github actions) without making AI part of the software. Does Makefile mean GNU Make wrote your program?

“AI. You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means”

🎶 No good deed goes unpunished. No act of charity goes un-resented. No good deed goes unpunished, that’s my new creed. 🎶

Your thought crime has been reported to the Ministry of Truth. Stand by for re-education.

Doubleplus good, comrade.

If you’re fungible for Claude Code, I feel bad for you son. I got 99 problems but Claude Code ain’t one.

Ps: am agreeing with you in case unclear.

deleted by creator

Nothing at all.

We’re entering a low trust era. I suspect there’s going to be less sharing and collaboration. Between dealing with entitlement, harassment of devs, slop code PRs etc…what incentive do FOSS devs have to share anything?

We’re going to see siloing on one end and people using AI on the other to make their own shit for themselves. Everything else in the middle will be a no man’s land.

Big tech was already hoarding, FOSS was already under pressure from VC-backed “open core” bait-and-switch models, and maintainer burnout was already a crisis. Now we get to deal with the FuckAI crowd asking “papers please” every 5 mins too?

Thanks, but no thanks. I’ll make for me and mine or if you pay. No good deed goes unpunished.

More like market driven perverse incentives.

Ethics is the study of oughts. That’s why the frame of reference matters. Law is the floor. Nobody said legal = acceptable. I said the copyright destruction mechanism is worth understanding before using it as a rhetorical grenade.

So no, you didn’t “gotcha”. You just wanted to try for a cheap shot / try to put words in my mouth so you could knock down a strawman for the cheap seats.

Some might consider that unethical, big man.

Cheers big ears.

Tilted? Hell no, I’m having a blast :)

But serious discussion about AI - on Lemmy? The famously fair and even-handed Lemmy? Where a single thread had people calling others morons, bots and accusing them of being anally puppeteered by Claude Code for having the temerity to disagree?

Nah.

We tried the substantive debate downstream.

Some people do

No, not at all. There’s some really good shit written in Rust. Didn’t someone just re-write Minecraft in Rust?

“Written in Rust” as a slop indicator is like an AI scanner flagging a repo as AI-coded. Poor heuristic, infinite false positives. Which circles back to: if professional devs can’t tell the difference between AI-written and human-written Rust, the FuckAI crowd needs to rethink what “slop” actually means.

Or we need to admit that Rust is just…fucked :)

Nothing at all. OP just wants to hang shit on people using Rust because OP has an axe to grind against AI - which, given half a chance, will elect to code in Rust (as it’s a well documented language). Therefore, Rust = sign of AI slop. (See downstream for their comments.

Rust is a fine language. Python is a fine language. OP needs a hug, some weed and BJ.

Do you? Pressing X to doubt, champ. Pressing X to doubt.

Quick - to wikipedia!

On this end, you responded to an upstream post - federation does weird things to comment threading.

As for the 2nd meme: I posted it. I’m Gus. You just accidentally complimented my methodology and insulted yourself. Do you need me to type more s-l-o-w-l-y?

I understand. It’s a deeply weird thread.

We’re on Lemmy, boss. We should probably be working instead of shitposting on communist Reddit

Bold of you to call me a clown from inside the circus. Also, I didn’t post the meme.

Beratna, you’re agreeing with me. Did you reply to the right comment?

Kowlting da forata, beratna.

PS: Im pensa na Claude fo da.

If it quacks like a duck etc etc.

I mean…if the meatbags can’t get it right, what chance do the poor clankers have.

Wah wah wah. Still no argument, tho.

Play the game not the man, champ.

TTFN!