Quite true.
It’s an argument I often have with the CLI only people, and have been having for years. Like ‘with this Cisco router I can do all kinds of shit with this super powerful CLI’. Yeah okay how do I forward a port? Well that takes 5 different commands…

Or I just want to understand what options are available- a GUI does that far better than a CLI.

Can this please be the final straw at last?

Very unlikely. The rest of the world has bigger fish to fry than a few more brown people getting killed. Americans have a president who seems like he wants world war 3, Europe is dealing with energy problems and the fact that a potential enemy, Russia, holds the only current solution, Asia is either China or worried about China, Africa and South America are dealing with their own shit and generally can’t be bothered.

Not to mention Israel is one of the few if only Western culture nations in the area, making them a strategic military ally for most of the western world. And the rest of the developed world has significant trade and technology connections to Israel.

Point is, Israel is useful, and if the cost of doing business is not getting involved when IDF shoots a few families, then so be it.

If this gets any sort of publicity, I am sure it will be blamed on some kind of misunderstanding or bad intel or tragic accident. The appropriate public relations words will be said and that will be the end of it.

Yup.
The problem is, how do you guarantee access control that works offline?

DVD DRM was based on a pretty simple system that was easy to crack.
HD-DVD (former blu-ray competitor) DRM was more advanced. Someone hacked a software player and extracted its decode key, which this was.
The DRM was designed to be updateable so any discs manufactured after this leak would use different keys (and anyone using the software app that’d been hacked would need an update). That didn’t stop this key from working on every disc in existence at the time.

That’s the problem with making software decoding available. It had to work offline, so you could have an authorized player software, and feed it any valid disk, and it’d Just Work. So even if you put a crypto enclave in the drive controller, the player software still needs its own way to authenticate itself to the drive.

Read up-

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AACS_encryption_key_controversy

Absolutely 100%. It is so frustrating to search for a couple of terms and have the search engine just ignore one or two of them, like no your stupid AI does not understand what I actually want please just give me what I fucking asked for.

Straight off to jail with you!

For those who don’t remember this- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AACS_encryption_key_controversy

What about second breakfast? I’m not sure they know about second breakfast Pippin…

Exactly. The only solutions is to make keeping people’s data a liability rather than an asset. That if there is any sort of beach there are criminal investigations and make the company liable for any and all losses stemming from that breach. Plus if their security was found negligent, than every one of their customers gets cause of action to personally sue them.

The next company to have a breach like this will go bankrupt. And that will sufficiently frighten the others.

AI or not, I feel like everybody has had “the incident” at some point. After that, you obsessively keep backups.

Yup!

Also totally unrelated helpful tip- triple check your inputs and outputs when using dd to clone a drive. dd works great to clone an old drive onto a new blank one. It is equally efficient at cloning a blank drive full of nothing but 0s over an old drive that has some 1s mixed in.

It is absolutely foul play.

OpenAI made secret deals with DRAM manufacturers, not for memory chips but for finished wafers straight out of the Fab. Then announced them both on the same day, meaning they had a one fell swoop purchased 50+% of the world’s memory supply for 2026.

OpenAI does not (as far as anyone knows) have the machinery to process these wafers, to slice them up and package them into memory chips.

Which means the only purpose of this move was to kill the global DRAM supply and drive up prices for the competition.

Personally I wish regulators would take a hard look at this deal.