No, that I can’t answer — it would depend entirely on the level of fallout and where it happens to land.

You would need to be able to perfectly, and I mean perfectly, predict weather months in advance in order to prepare accordingly.

The reaility is that for an AI, or rather an AGI, to make the choice to launch nukes would require them to reach a point where they accept the potential loss of their own ‘life’ in exchange for whatever value a nuclear war might hold. I struggle to believe that a ‘true’ AGI would make that choice. There are far too many variables to control in comparison to a biological agent, one that likely would not affect a machine.

Now, a modern AI making that choice? Absolutely possible, the things are fucking crazy with literally no concept of what life is.

I repeat, radiation absolutely fucks electronic components. I am not talking about an emp, I am talking about radiation.

Radiation absolutely fucks electronic components

No, I didn’t mean to call you conservative — I just think that pointing to Biden instead of addressing the elephant in the room, Trump, is useless and subject to criticism.

because they’re riddled with child rapists too most likely.

This I don’t doubt. Whoever has hurt kids the way the Epstein class has should burn.

I wholeheartedly agree that Biden could have done more. I even said as much. He was a terribly ineffective (or effective, if you’re a billionaire or billionaire adjacent) president and I hate that he was the only reasonable option to vote for against Trump.

He didn’t. Move on, vote for people to ensure it never happens again.

People really do not like to be reminded that the only thing that separates us from animals is our ability to save information.

Seriously, it all comes down to collected knowledge.

This is a post about something that happened during Trumps first term. Biden was not president then, and given what we’ve seen during Trump’s second term, why would you think Trump’s cronies in place would do anything other than obfuscate?

I’m not an expert, but I will say — the Fox news is strong in you for bringing up Biden in a post about something Trump’s admin did in his first term. Like seriously, you have a future at that network.

You’re right, Biden should have done more.

Biden didn’t rape kids and cover it up. Why are you talking about Biden?

I guess I’ll know to be impressed by AI when it can distinguish things like sarcasm.

Absolutely not, I’m still just scratching my head at how something like this is allowed to happen.

Has any human ever said that they’re worried about their car getting dirtied on the way to the carwash? Maybe I could see someone arguing against getting a carwash, citing it getting dirty on the way home — but on the way there?

Like you would think it wouldn’t have the basis to even put those words together that way — should I see this as a hallucination?

Granted, I would never ask an AI a question like this — it seems very far outside of potential use cases for it (for me).

Edit: oh, I guess it could have been said by a person in a sarcastic sense

Dirtying the car on the way there?

The car you’re planning on cleaning at the car wash?

Like, an AI not understanding the difference between walking and driving almost makes sense. This, though, seems like such a weird logical break that I feel like it shouldn’t be possible.