Z72.53

I was in the kiddie psych ward once when I was 12. The place was empty except for me and this girl. She sat next to me and was talking to me and touching me when I was in really a totally awful state.

After I got out of the kiddie psych ward I was mandated to go to therapy every week. In the waiting room of the place was girl who knew my name from me being called in and kept trying to talk to me and touch me meanwhile I was in no mood because those therapy sessions were awful and I dreaded them.

I’m already homeless and I’ve got an okay job. So I either I keep living like I do or things become too expensive and I die.

Definitely. I couldn’t afford to anyway, but I would not want to be one of the early adopters. But eventually, they’ll be hacked and it’ll be possible to remove any insidious corporate “features” and I’d be left with all the benefits.

Mine just says I like analog and vintage photography stuff and lacy and shiny clothes. Neither of which are very shocking.

It’s not a memorial lol. I’m actively using it. I just know that it would be strange to find.

Why would I buy an actual sharps container? I gotta take weekly injections.

Aside from adult items, it would be my collection of 400 keys all on a bunch of different connected key rings or maybe my rum bottle full of used needles.

I got a union job and made the bed in my car nice and comfy

deleted by creator

LLMs are not intelligent. They lack morals, knowledge, and intent. The only remote risk of extermination is if a company with absolute impunity and endless resources told an LLM to hack the nuclear weapons and if knowledge of how to do that was already published online and processed as training data.

LLMs cannot do anything new, they can only regurgitate information thats already been stolen.

Ed Zitron’s podcast “Better Offline” recently talked about this. There is a small tech community called the Rationalists who believe AI super intelligence is inevitable and it will either accelerate humanity to new heights or kill off the species. These rationalists are actually a very prominent faction within tech and the AI industry. Apparently the language used within top AI firms is largely about the immense danger posed by AI super intelligence if any other group or company were to achieve it first. This creates an echo chamber that makes the people in the industry kind of lose their mind and misinterpret the capability of LLMs.

Everyone outside that faction recognizes that LLMs are just unreliable cloud software with limited use cases and that there’s no evidence LLMs could actually lead to any kind of intelligence.

Edit: Please, someone stop me from commenting on an AI post next time I’m tempted. I’m so tired of people replying, arguing with opinions I don’t have, based entirely around a hypothetical technology that doesn’t exist yet. LLMs make slop. Thats it. They hacked a company after weeks of 100s of instances being run, using old exploits published online. San Francisco will be underwater from climate change before LLMs can do anything more.

Take estrogen.

If I had to pick one, it’s my Gameboy. I use that the most.

There’s also: probably half of my books, most of my cameras, my old consoles, my sewing machine, and there’s probably more stuff. I’m kind of obsessed with old things.