I think the golden rule with LLMs is “never trust the output.” If it’s a task you can 100% verify or has virtually no associated risk, then go right ahead.
It’s just so deeply frustrating to keep seeing people look at LLM results and treat them as truthful instead of truthy.
When’s waking and breakfast, though?
Thought this post was going in VERY different direction from the first few sentences!
Or rather, nothing exists until it is perceived?
Counterpoint: affectionate acts form a nearly-continuous spectrum from chaste to extreme. You could draw a line virtually anywhere and still make the argument that the two adjacent acts are basically the same.
Anybody can code an application, it takes a software engineer to barely code it.
Lol. HOAs are on a strict boot-based diet. Any well-reasoned argument will just make them install MORE of them.
Also: I really want to introduce the neologism caligavore. Can we all make that a thing?
The answer is almost certainly, but the followup question is how much pellet gun?
How’s the bedbug colony treating you?