CAnthonyScott.io
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Wilshire@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · 3 years ago

Judge upholds $83m E Jean Carroll defamation verdict against Trump

www.theguardian.com

external-link
message-square
11
link
fedilink
0
external-link

Judge upholds $83m E Jean Carroll defamation verdict against Trump

www.theguardian.com

Wilshire@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · 3 years ago
message-square
11
link
fedilink
The former president’s motion for a new trial was denied and his argument deemed ‘entirely without merit’
alert-triangle
You must log in or register to comment.
  • originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 years ago

    so he actually has to pony up the full amount now? no more bond, just pay it?

    • Telodzrum@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      This comment should be deleted soon

      • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 years ago

        I don’t see how SCOTUS would ever agree to take this case, either. That said, I won’t put it past them

        • Telodzrum@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          deleted by creator

          • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 years ago

            Can you actually appeal anything to the SC with enough $$$ or is there a type of denial earlier in the process that then prohibits it?

            • Telodzrum@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              This comment should be deleted soon

      • frezik@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 years ago

        It’s a New York state civil case. SCOTUS would be going way out of their way to get involved in this one.

        • Telodzrum@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          This comment should be deleted soon

      • stoly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 years ago

        SCOTUS won’t override a state court on matters of state law. The will always defer to the highest court in each state unless there is a federal question involved.

        • Telodzrum@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          This comment should be deleted soon

          • stoly@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 years ago

            The Supreme Court has the right to issue certiorari over any case with a few exceptions where Congress has created specific courts to have original jurisdiction. Bankruptcy court is an example as well as immigration court. The question isn’t whether they can but which cases to prioritize given the amount of time they have available each year.

            • Telodzrum@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              This comment should be deleted soon

News@lemmy.world

news@lemmy.world

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: [email protected]

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person or their instance. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on. Keep on-topic


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.

Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.

If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.

All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 3.08K users / day
  • 6.8K users / week
  • 10.5K users / month
  • 19K users / 6 months
  • 1 local subscriber
  • 39.9K subscribers
  • 6.95K Posts
  • 101K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • gedaliyah@lemmy.world
  • JonsJava@lemmy.world
  • 🌱 🐄🌱 @lemmy.world
  • jeffw@lemmy.world
  • enu@lemmy.world
  • rjc@lemmy.world
  • Tenthrow@lemmy.world
  • BE: 0.19.20
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org