• gointhefridge@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    I’m an artist with music on Spotify. I honestly don’t know how I feel about this.

    I know Metallica got a lot of shit about Napster back in the day, but I can’t help but feel like they were right. They were (by my recollection) trying to ensure artists still have a claim to their body of work. I know the industry has come so far since then, but it feels like the moment everything started to slowly become “content” and not art.

    I just want real people to actually enjoy my music. I don’t expect to make a living or even real money off my music, but I also don’t like someone else making money off my art and using it to train AI models.

    I made something meaningful, no one else gets to decide that they wanna commodify it or use it to make slop.

    • Terminarchs@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      From a musician to another, as someone else replied, if you’re making your work available digitally then you immediately lose control over if people pay for it or not. The good thing is, the ones who want to support you will if you give them a way. But you just can’t coerce them anymore. Spotify and other similar platforms are getting the whole cake because of the convenience that they offer, that’s it. And I’m sure you know how little of that cake trickles down to you.

      • ozymandias117@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        As a listener, if a band I like is touring within 2 hours of where I live, I go see them live and get a shirt

        I hope that’s helping them more than whether I listen to a scraped digital copy or not