• chronicledmonocle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    The reason Americans don’t buy EVs is because all EVs sold in America are:

    1. More expensive than their ICE equivalents initially
    2. Are made by idiots like GM who make their cars only pre-2023 or for one year in 2026 (seriously GM just make the fucking Bolt)
    3. Nissan…who just FINALLY got it through their fucking heads that air cooled batteries and Chademo are bad ideas as they’re about to go bankrupt
    4. Are Tesla and financially supports the trillionaire neo-nazi.

    There are very few basic, cheap EVs on the American market. Tesla is really the only one and most of us refuse to support that prick.

    I just bought a used 2023 Bolt EUV a few months ago. Absolutely love the thing. I got it for $15.5k and it still has 5 years of warranty. And GM decided “hey…you know that car you love? We’re going to stop making it because it doesn’t have the margins our big boi SUV gas guzzlers have. Sorry and fuck you”.

    • blitzen@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago
      1. They depreciate faster than room temperature milk.

      Now, that depreciation may be (or probably is) offset by the decreased fuel and maintenance costs, but I see this point too often ignored.

      • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        I’m planning to get an EV (when I can afford one, who on earth can afford to buy new cars??) but my biggest concern is with battery degradation - it’s improved a bunch, but you’re still looking at 80-85% capacity after 8 years with gentle use - which if the car already just barely has the range I need… nngh. It really doesn’t get talked about and it’s such a huge part of the logistics you need to consider when getting an EV.

        • chronicledmonocle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Unless you’re travelling 200+ miles every day and assuming a 20% reduction in range after 8-10 years, most EVs start with ~225-250 miles of range, so at 80%, which is pretty much the realistic worst case scenario, that’s still around 180-200 miles of range.

          Plus, they don’t need oil changes/spark plugs/coils/etc., electric is cheaper than gas per mile by usually 2-4x, they don’t need brakes or calipers hardly because of regen braking, and so much more.

          • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            I know, but thanks for taking the time to put that together.

            (ah, you edited in the second paragraph - upkeep is lower yes, obviously gas is more expensive than electricity as a fuel, but afaik wear on breaks actually tends to be higher given the increased weight of EVs. This has little to do with the practical longevity of the vehicle, however.)

            • chronicledmonocle@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              For sure and fair enough.

              I just feel the need to remind people when they mention degradation as a concern, that a degraded battery after a decade doesn’t just turn into a paperweight. It just goes slightly less far.

              • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                Losing 1/5 of your range isn’t exactly a slight reduction. When the topic is “this logistical aspect is underdiscussed” downplaying its importance is somewhat unhelpful, but I do appreciate the sentiment here.

        • blitzen@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          Not to mention the need at some point to replace the battery, which can cost thousands.

          I don’t mention that and the depreciation bullet point to disparage EV adoption. It’s a good thing we are moving away from ICE to EV. But it’s a little like two steps forward one step back, and most people don’t talk about the one step back parts.

          • chronicledmonocle@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            Batteries don’t usually just “die” though. You don’t have to even think about replacing it. Even if a 250 mile EV loses 30% of its capacity after 8-10 years (which is higher than most besides older gen Nissan Leafs), that means it can still drive 175 miles.

            • innermachine@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 days ago

              True what if half the year is below freezing? Now the range might be 100 miles. Still enough for most people to commute daily but could present issue if you’d driving home for Christmas. We are still in the early days of ev, and I think another leap in battery tech will make EV a no brainer. Ice cars do degrade but a well cared for ice will run 300k miles for a gasser and likely 2x for a diesel, and run for decades. I have driven 70 year old CJ3b that was in a barn for 15+ years. Drug it out, put air in tires, set points, drained + filled tank and spun the crank by hand with some oil in cyls before trying to fire. Had it putting down the road in a few hours, something to be said about those old machines!

              • chronicledmonocle@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                Diesels don’t run for shit anymore. All of the DPF and EGR systems kill them after 150-200k max. Gone are the days of the 7.3L Ford or 5.9 Cummins that were bulletproof. I still drive around my gasser 7.5L in my 95 F250, but it’s a gas guzzling beast.

                As for range loss on cold, that’s true for LFP batteries. Not NMC, which is what most cars use. Range loss in the winter is mostly from climate control, but unless your car is using a resistive heater, this isn’t hardly any range loss.

                • innermachine@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  Well I’ve personally seen multiple 15+ Duramax with over a quarter million miles, and my co worker has a 3.0 eco diesel Cherokee with just over 200k! That’s more than impressive for a modern stellantis product lmfao. But I do get your point, their not as reliable as they used to be for sure. I work on old diesel land rovers and there’s nothing quite like a 1.9 idi rattling it’s guts out to struggle moving a glorified powered wheelbarrow lol. And all these new diesel rigs anything like 02+ is basically pull the cab off the frame for any service so ur not doing much of that shit at home unless you have a skid steer or forklift or an actual lift at ur disposal. NMC do still loose range in the cold, and coupled with the energy required to heat the cabin your certainly not getting the range you’d expect on a nice mild 55-70* day. A gas or diesel produces a lot of waste heat, which used to heat the cabin does not affect range. Ice vehicles do not sacrifice any significant range to either heat or cool the cabin, but I’m sure once we have slightly more energy dense batteries that can hold more KWH / lb we will be having a whole different conversation.

    • setVeryLoud(true);@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      Hyundai and KIA are notably missing from your list. Besides the DC converter failures, they’re very solid.

      Toyota / Subaru make EVs, but in a “fiiiine, if you insist” way, their heart really wasn’t into it and it shows.

      • chronicledmonocle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Ioniq 5 and 6 also suffer from ICCU failures like crazy and other gremlins in their high voltage system. I was going to buy an Ioniq 5, but this steered me clear of the brand for now.

        The Kia Soul EV seems fine, but isn’t it super range limited like the Nissan Leaf used to be? I haven’t looked at them in a while, but last I knew their Soul EV only got ~120-150 miles of range.

        • setVeryLoud(true);@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago
          1. This is Hyundai USA and KIA USA, vehicles in other markets were not affected (it affected both equally btw, their turn key vehicles lacked interlock chips and the FMVSS doesn’t require them, so they found a way to cheap out)
          2. This is limited to older turn key vehicles, pre-2021. All their EVs have smart keys.
          • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            yes. I don’t think they still feature this vulnerability.

            but it was so bad, and such a stupid thing to cheap out on - I’ll never trust the brand.