hamburgheftig@feddit.org to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 day agoFed up with vibe coders, dev sneaks data-nuking prompt injection into their code - Ars Technicaarstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square120linkfedilinkarrow-up1574arrow-down19
arrow-up1565arrow-down1external-linkFed up with vibe coders, dev sneaks data-nuking prompt injection into their code - Ars Technicaarstechnica.comhamburgheftig@feddit.org to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 day agomessage-square120linkfedilink
minus-squaremabeledo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down2·9 hours agoLibraries can be audited. LLM generated code cannot.
minus-squareJakeroxs@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·3 hours agoYes it can, its literally still code.
minus-squaremabeledo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·3 hours agoI know it’s code. You are missing the point. Any library with a critical user mass is auditable, because a fraction of those users would take the time to do so, whereas all LLM generated variations of the same library cannot and will never be auditable.
minus-squareJakeroxs@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·3 hours agoThat’s literally not what you said, you said “LLM code can not be auditable” which is demonstrably wrong. Go ahead and move the goal posts though.
minus-squaremabeledo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·3 hours agoYou missed the context. I don’t blame you.
Libraries can be audited. LLM generated code cannot.
Yes it can, its literally still code.
I know it’s code. You are missing the point.
Any library with a critical user mass is auditable, because a fraction of those users would take the time to do so, whereas all LLM generated variations of the same library cannot and will never be auditable.
That’s literally not what you said, you said “LLM code can not be auditable” which is demonstrably wrong.
Go ahead and move the goal posts though.
You missed the context. I don’t blame you.