• Saledovil@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    18 hours ago

    The traffic calming in Eugene, Oregon, has already reduced the number of annual traffic fatalities from 22 to 10. I don’t know what you can call this other than a resounding success.

    • CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      Like many communities across the country, Eugene saw a major rise in fatal traffic crashes during and after the COVID-19 pandemic. The 2025 decrease matches a larger national trend as well, with a nearly 7% decrease nationwide, 10% decrease in the State of Oregon, and a 32% decrease in Portland.

      I’d call it being in line with a reduction in fatalities everywhere now that driving habits are back to normal after COVID drastically changed the landscape for years.

      https://kval.com/news/local/eugene-traffic-deaths-fall-to-10-in-2025-down-55-from-record-22-in-2024-lane-county-oregon

      In any case, thats not what I was referring to. I was referring to the Governors proposed plan of installing tolls on all the freeways in the metro region to not only charge poorer drivers up to $20 a day to get to work, but to also increase congestion so that people are disincentivized from driving, which is completely unrealistic nonsense.

      I have no problem with changing road designs in neighborhoods to slow people down but this plan is bullshit. Pedestrians aren’t even allowed on freeways and just as a bigger joke, freeway speeds are now lower (55MPH-65MPH) than what you’re allowed to drive on rural Oregon highways (70MPH) despite those rural highways having houses, bikers, and pedestrians and no division between you and oncoming traffic.