• melsaskca@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    As an aside, I grew up using the phrase “by accident” and I find that it has been slowly replaced with “on accident”. Back to the issue at hand, I totally agree with your sentiment.

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 hours ago

      They mean two different things…

      The airplanes engine went out by accident when a part failed.

      Or

      The pilot forgot to deploy landing gear which caused a crash landing on accident

      It’s about if someone made a mistake or if it was random chance.

      People don’t understand it means two different things, and use them interchangeably. It was used incorrectly here, it should be “by accident” because that implies a human was at fault, “on accident” absolves everyone involved from blame.

      • melsaskca@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Never thought of it that way. Makes sense, now I don’t have to think it was the Mandela effect.

        • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 hours ago

          Yeah, it’s honestly super interesting how language and word choice change perception.

          I remember reading something a while ago that just due to the English language’s structure and various idiosyncrasies, just using it makes people more selfish.

          And it’s happening on such a basic level, it’s almost impossible for people to notice. It just colors every communication in a veneer of “me first”.