This hardly feels like a useful comment. It’s implied from the context that change here is shorthand for desirable change.
And if we are being pedantic, you are also wrong: there will be unspecified change, changes in fact, which may be good, bad, neutral or irrelevant. Also not a very constructive point to add: we all know this.
Essentially (and as usual), there needs to be consequences.
No consequences, no change.
So yes, you are right.
That’s wrong. Without consequences there will be change, always to the worse, always seeing if they can get away with even more insane things.
This hardly feels like a useful comment. It’s implied from the context that change here is shorthand for desirable change.
And if we are being pedantic, you are also wrong: there will be unspecified change, changes in fact, which may be good, bad, neutral or irrelevant. Also not a very constructive point to add: we all know this.