You must log in or # to comment.
My take on the article
- If it was written by AI, the author should have done a manual pass to simplify it and make it more approachable
- If it was not written by AI, the author should probably have asked AI to review for readability
Either way, the article was done in such a way that it is hard to read. It also misses
- Why should I care about this?
- Why does this matter?
At least those things were missing early on in the article. I scanned through it, but the article did not seem to take into account explaining why one should spend cycles reading this.

