ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 15 days agoFederal Surveillance Tech Becomes Mandatory in New Cars by 2027www.yahoo.comexternal-linkmessage-square395linkfedilinkarrow-up1873arrow-down117file-textcross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1856arrow-down1external-linkFederal Surveillance Tech Becomes Mandatory in New Cars by 2027www.yahoo.comArmchairAce1944@discuss.online to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 15 days agomessage-square395linkfedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squareM0oP0o@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·13 days agoEh, that seems like falling into the two party fallacy. Plenty of silly in every sub group.
minus-squareEugene V. Debs' Ghost@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·13 days agoFair, I just find the people who want more surveillance because of a vague “protecting the community” to be stupid.
minus-squareM0oP0o@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·13 days agoOh yes a very silly position to hold over all. But lets not pretend its a unique viewpoint only held by one sub group or another. Way too many people yell “won’t someone think of the children” while taking the most oppressive position.
minus-squareEugene V. Debs' Ghost@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·13 days agoFair, Tipper Gore comes to mind.
Eh, that seems like falling into the two party fallacy. Plenty of silly in every sub group.
Fair, I just find the people who want more surveillance because of a vague “protecting the community” to be stupid.
Oh yes a very silly position to hold over all. But lets not pretend its a unique viewpoint only held by one sub group or another. Way too many people yell “won’t someone think of the children” while taking the most oppressive position.
Fair, Tipper Gore comes to mind.