• Ulrich@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    3 days ago

    Once again, no they didn’t. Literally just look it up. You have the knowledge of the world at your fingertips.

    The term “sideload” was coined in the late 1990s by online storage service i-drive as an alternative means of transferring and storing computer files virtually instead of physically

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sideloading

    Had I said “downloading” it wouldn’t have made much sense, would it?

    • chunes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      listen, I’ve been in technology since before i-drive existed and I’ve never heard of i-drive nor do I care about the vocabulary they used.

      The first time I ever heard the term sideloading was when these mobile stores started using it to make other options sound illegitimate.

      • Ulrich@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Oh well if that was the first time you heard it, that must have been when it came into existence…?

    • Arcane2077@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yep, and that definition was definitely what you meant lmfao.

      You’re obviously within spitting distance of the point, you basically spelled it out in your last sentence, just, I don’t know, reread your words slowly?

      • Ulrich@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yep, and that definition was definitely what you meant lmfao.

        What difference does it make? Thats the origin of the word. I’ve provided evidence that it was not invented by Apple. Where’s your evidence?

        You’re obviously within spitting distance of the point

        The point is, we have words for a reason. And there’s no reason to use 12 when I can use 1. Sorry you’re having trouble understanding that.

    • lIlIlIlIlIlIl@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Can I ask you why Google has deliberately chosen to ALWAYS use the term sideloading? Doesn’t that seem weird for an internet company - who should know better - to not just say “install?”

      How do you think this came to be?

      • Ulrich@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Can I ask you why Google has deliberately chosen to ALWAYS use the term

        For the same reason I ALWAYS use it: Because it’s shorter than “installing apps from outside the Google Play Store”.

        How do you think this came to be?

        I literally just told you that in the comment you replied to.

          • Ulrich@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            Google is not neutral, that doesn’t mean they invented the word or that the word itself is somehow inexplicably malicious.

            • lIlIlIlIlIlIl@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              I don’t think they invented the word

              It’s naive to think Google doesn’t have a reason behind the popularization of a term that indicates to the user they’re not the one in ultimate control of their own personal device

              Keep getting upset over it though if that makes you happy