Because of the ubiquity, nay, monopoly of systemd I always assumed it was miles ahead of other init systems. Nope. I’ve been using a non-systemd environment for a while and must say I’m surprised by how little breaks, i.e., next to nothing. Moreover, boot and shutdown times are faster, and more of that good stuff. I suggest trying it out.

https://nosystemd.org/.

  • greyscale@lemmy.grey.ooo
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 hours ago

    its the default, its the default everywhere, nobody is changing that configuration because systemd is a massive blob of nonsense.

    Why is it the default?

    • flying_sheep@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Because most people prefer it. Again: having a minority taste doesn’t mean you’re oppressed when there’s an option to have what you want.

      • greyscale@lemmy.grey.ooo
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 hours ago

        I don’t remember anyone -asking- for systemd, I just remember being subjected to it at the time it started getting popular.

        If systemd is the solution, I want my problem back.