CAnthonyScott.io
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
themachinestops@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 days ago

Italian television channel does DLSS 5 haters a favor by broadcasting footage from reveal trailer, then copyright striking Nvidia's own YouTube channel

www.pcgamer.com

external-link
message-square
33
link
fedilink
379
external-link

Italian television channel does DLSS 5 haters a favor by broadcasting footage from reveal trailer, then copyright striking Nvidia's own YouTube channel

www.pcgamer.com

themachinestops@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 days ago
message-square
33
link
fedilink
That's a spicy DLSSaball.
  • artyom@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    3 days ago

    This is really less to do with any companies and more to do with poorly written copyright legislation (DMCA).

    • andyburke@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Who uh … who do you think wrote the DMCA? That is definitely one of the shitty systems I am referrimg to above.

      • artyom@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        37
        ·
        3 days ago

        …companies do not write legislation. Politicians do.

        • 3abas@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          36
          ·
          3 days ago

          Oh boy. Have you heard of this concept calling lobbying?

          Your politicians don’t represent you, they represent the highest bidder, which are the wealthy corporations trying to enslave you.

          • artyom@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            35
            ·
            3 days ago

            Lobbyists also don’t write legislation.

            • MagicShel@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              39
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 days ago

              That is, unfortunately incorrect. They write it up and their pet legislators introduce it. Yes it has to get voted on and there is more to it, but the actual verbiage? That is all too often written by lobbyists.

              • artyom@piefed.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                20
                ·
                2 days ago

                It’s not incorrect.

                • ozamataz@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  14
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  https://www.usatoday.com/pages/interactives/asbestos-sharia-law-model-bills-lobbyists-special-interests-influence-state-laws/

                  https://www.npr.org/sections/itsallpolitics/2013/11/11/243973620/when-lobbyists-literally-write-the-bill

                  • 3abas@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    6
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    2 days ago

                    They’re just refusing to be wrong, they’re doubling down on a technicality, not on who actually authors the legislation text.

                  • artyom@piefed.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    3
                    ·
                    2 days ago

                    Your own links are contradicting you.

        • SaltySalamander@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          26
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          3 days ago

          Oh you sweeeeeet summer child you.

          • artyom@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            14
            ·
            2 days ago

            Oh, honey, God bless your little heart…

            • greyscale@lemmy.grey.ooo
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              Please inform yourself of the adjacency of lobbyist centers and capital hill.

              Politicians don’t write shit, they get given frameworks and proposals from lobbyists and “industry leaders”, sometimes they get made into law directly without edit, especially when it comes to smaller ordinances.

              There are designated handlers from the larger lobby groups for designated politicans and congress-critters.

              They should wear jumpsuits like nascar, maybe you and the public would understand it better.

              Edit: Looking at the rest of your replies you’re getting downvoted to oblivion for denying reality.

              • artyom@piefed.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                2 days ago

                I don’t need to inform myself of anything. I already know. The lobbyists do not write legislation.

                • SaltySalamander@fedia.io
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  Willful ignorance is still ignorance.

                  • artyom@piefed.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    2 days ago

                    Agreed.

                • greyscale@lemmy.grey.ooo
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  Wow. You’re cooked.

                  I’d love to know more about your life, your living situation… how you got this way.

                  • artyom@piefed.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    2 days ago

                    Hmm you make a compelling argument, I’m forced to reconsider my position.

    • kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 days ago

      No, the DMCA (which does overall suck) has severe penalties for false takedown requests. It also has severe penalties for failing to honor takedown requests, though, so YouTube made its own system that is decidedly not DMCA and allows any big company to take down videos with impunity regardless of whether their claims have any merit.

      • andyburke@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        Have there ever been any consequences for false takedown requests you could point me at?

        • kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          Not any that I’m aware of. Most takedowns you hear about aren’t actually DMCA takedowns, they’re platform-specific systems that have no legal standing and no penalties for false requests. However, the DMCA does specifically say that false requests are a form of perjury.

Technology@lemmy.world

technology@lemmy.world

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: [email protected]

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


  • @[email protected]
  • @[email protected]
  • @[email protected]
  • @[email protected]
Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 3.64K users / day
  • 8.52K users / week
  • 15.9K users / month
  • 19.4K users / 6 months
  • 1 local subscriber
  • 83.6K subscribers
  • 1.62K Posts
  • 45.4K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • L3s@lemmy.world
  • enu@lemmy.world
  • Technopagan@lemmy.world
  • L4sBot@lemmy.world
  • L3s@hackingne.ws
  • BE: 0.19.15
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org