• jj4211@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    5 days ago

    Well, it looks like they state three options:

    • Passkeys. This won’t work over a medium term, period. It’s tantamount to saying that SSH keys prove someone is human. If there’s enough interest, they’ll just make a software passkey solution that can work. Passkey being “human interactive” is purely a client-side construct.

    • Biometric services. Strictly speaking, not an ID but it’s not hard to imagine leveraging capturing biometrics to an ID like scenario.

    • Government IDs. Well that’s self explanatory.

    They do state distancing themselves from the ID by trusting a third party service, but 3rd party ID service is still a thing.

    Of course, this seems to be only after someone accuses you of being a bot and Reddit bothering to pay attention. Which may be almost no one.

    • Alaknár@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      Precisely. Any of the listed options is better than a captcha. None of the options are perfect, obviously, we’re using yesterday’s tech to solve a tomorrow’s problem, but it’s something, and it doesn’t immediately mean “privacy online is dead”.

      • BJ_and_the_bear@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        I’d rather put up with a captcha than do any on those other things, especially if it was temporary. Or maybe they could do something like Anubis

            • Alaknár@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 days ago

              Not sure I understand what you mean.

              Like, you verify the account and then give it away to a bot? My assumption is that the “proof of human” would be a unique identifier, meaning that once you’ve attached it to an account, you can’t use it to verify another.