• sem@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    This is what they found:

    Bisphenol A (BPA) appeared in 98% of samples, and its substitute, bisphenol S (BPS), was found in more than three-quarters. Synthetic chemicals used to stiffen plastic, BPA and BPS mimic the action of oestrogen inside organisms, causing a range of adverse effects

    It doesn’t say how much. Remember to only handle receipt paper with gloves and never wet hands. /s

    Seriously though, we should figure out as a society what is toxic.

  • jonesy@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    I’m all for reducing harm from these toxic substances, but are there any studies showing these substances pose actual risk under normal use?

    • hector@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      Studies paid for by the industries that profit from pollutants all show those pollutants are safe yes. First day in the western world?

      • jonesy@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        Ok but what about the studies showing they’re unsafe? It’s easy to be scared of scary sounding chemical names and allege they could cause cancer or infertility or whatever, but I am asking for the evidence where these substances have actually had a measurable or observable effect, whether it’s cancer or infertility. As it is this article sounds like the same people on social media claiming that all our foods are killing us unless we only eat organic non-GMO.